Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy

被引:114
作者
Gurudu, Suryakanth R. [1 ]
Ramirez, Francisco C. [1 ]
Harrison, M. Edwyn [1 ]
Leighton, Jonathan A. [1 ]
Crowell, Michael D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Arizona, Div Gastroenterol, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 USA
关键词
POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL; BOWEL PREPARATION; ELECTROLYTE-SOLUTION; QUALITY INDICATORS; COLORECTAL CANCERS; BLIND TRIAL; IMPACT; EFFICACY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.456
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background: Recent studies using split-dose preparations (SDPs) suggest a significant improvement in the quality of preparation and patient compliance. However, the effects of SDP on other quality indicators of colonoscopy, such as cecal intubation and adenoma detection rates, have not been previously reported, to our knowledge. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to compare polyp detection rates (PDRs) and adenoma detection rates (ADRs) before and after the implementation of an SDP as the preferred bowel preparation. The secondary objectives were to compare the quality of the preparation and colonoscopy completion rates before and after implementation of the SDP. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Tertiary care medical center. Patients: Patients undergoing colonoscopy for screening and surveillance of colon polyps and cancer. Interventions: System-wide implementation of SDP. Results: A total of 3560 patients in the pre-SDP group and 1615 patients in the post-SDP group were included in the study. SDP use increased significantly from 9% to 74% after implementation. In comparison with the pre-SDP group, both PDRs (44.1%-49.5%; P < .001) and ADRs (26.7%-31.8%; P < .001) significantly improved in the post-SDP group. The colonoscopy completion rate significantly increased from 93.6% to 95.5% in the post-SDP group (P = .008). Bowel preparation quality also improved significantly (P < .001) in the post-SDP group. Limitations: Retrospective design; not all endoscopists were the same in both periods. Conclusions: System-wide implementation of an SDP as the primary choice for colonoscopy significantly improved both PDRs and ADRs, overall quality of the preparation, and colonoscopy completion rates. (Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:603-8.)
引用
收藏
页码:603 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of the adjunct use of tegaserod in whole-dose or split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation [J].
Abdul-Baki, Heitham ;
Hashash, Jana G. ;
ElHajj, Ihab I. ;
Azar, Cecilio ;
El Zahabi, Lara ;
Mourad, Fadi H. ;
Barada, Kassem A. ;
Sharara, Ala I. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 68 (02) :294-300
[2]
A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation [J].
Aoun, E ;
Abdul-Baki, H ;
Azar, C ;
Mourad, F ;
Barada, K ;
Berro, Z ;
Tarchichi, M ;
Sharara, AI .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 62 (02) :213-218
[3]
A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda [J].
Aronchick, CA ;
Lipshutz, WH ;
Wright, SH ;
Dufrayne, F ;
Bergman, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (03) :346-352
[4]
Effect of a Time-Dependent Colonoscopic Withdrawal Protocol on Adenoma Detection During Screening Colonoscopy [J].
Barclay, Robert L. ;
Vicari, Joseph J. ;
Greenlaw, Roger L. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 6 (10) :1091-1098
[5]
Association of Colonoscopy and Death From Colorectal Cancer [J].
Baxter, Nancy N. ;
Goldwasser, Meredith A. ;
Paszat, Lawrence F. ;
Saskin, Refik ;
Urbach, David R. ;
Rabeneck, Linda .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 150 (01) :1-W1
[6]
The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy [J].
Ben-Horin, Shomron ;
Bar-Meir, Simon ;
Avidan, Benjamin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (12) :2680-2685
[7]
Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: A population-based analysis [J].
Bressler, Brian ;
Paszat, Lawrence F. ;
Chen, Zhongliang ;
Rothwell, Deanna M. ;
Vinden, Chris ;
Rabeneck, Linda .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 132 (01) :96-102
[8]
Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: An orientation [J].
Hanley, JA ;
Negassa, A ;
Edwardes, MDD ;
Forrester, JE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 157 (04) :364-375
[9]
Prospective assessment of the impact of feedback on colonoscopy performance [J].
Harewood, GC ;
Petersen, BT ;
Ott, BJ .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 24 (02) :313-318
[10]
Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia [J].
Harewood, GC ;
Sharma, VK ;
de Garmo, P .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (01) :76-79