Quantitative Imaging in Cancer Evolution and Ecology

被引:382
作者
Gatenby, Robert A. [1 ]
Grove, Olya
Gillies, Robert J.
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Radiol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CELL LUNG-CANCER; SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY; CLONAL EVOLUTION; POTENTIAL MARKER; TEXTURE ANALYSIS; MRI; SURVIVAL; IMAGES; TUMORS; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.13122697
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Cancer therapy, even when highly targeted, typically fails because of the remarkable capacity of malignant cells to evolve effective adaptations. These evolutionary dynamics are both a cause and a consequence of cancer system heterogeneity at many scales, ranging from genetic properties of individual cells to large-scale imaging features. Tumors of the same organ and cell type can have remarkably diverse appearances in different patients. Furthermore, even within a single tumor, marked variations in imaging features, such as necrosis or contrast enhancement, are common. Similar spatial variations recently have been reported in genetic profiles. Radiologic heterogeneity within tumors is usually governed by variations in blood flow, whereas genetic heterogeneity is typically ascribed to random mutations. However, evolution within tumors, as in all living systems, is subject to Darwinian principles; thus, it is governed by predictable and reproducible interactions between environmental selection forces and cell phenotype (not genotype). This link between regional variations in environmental properties and cellular adaptive strategies may permit clinical imaging to be used to assess and monitor intratumoral evolution in individual patients. This approach is enabled by new methods that extract, report, and analyze quantitative, reproducible, and mineable clinical imaging data. However, most current quantitative metrics lack spatialness, expressing quantitative radiologic features as a single value for a region of interest encompassing the whole tumor. In contrast, spatially explicit image analysis recognizes that tumors are heterogeneous but not well mixed and defines regionally distinct habitats, some of which appear to harbor tumor populations that are more aggressive and less treatable than others. By identifying regional variations in key environmental selection forces and evidence of cellular adaptation, clinical imaging can enable us to define intratumoral Darwinian dynamics before and during therapy. Advances in image analysis will place clinical imaging in an increasingly central role in the development of evolution-based patient-specific cancer therapy. (C) RSNA, 2013
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 15
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Texture analysis in assessment and prediction of chemotherapy response in breast cancer [J].
Ahmed, Arfan ;
Gibbs, Peter ;
Pickles, Martin ;
Turnbull, Lindsay .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 38 (01) :89-101
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EVOLUTIONARY GAME TH, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511542633
[3]   Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling [J].
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
Townsend Peterson, A. .
ECOLOGY, 2012, 93 (07) :1527-1539
[4]   Quantifying heterogeneity in human tumours using MRI and PET [J].
Asselin, Marie-Claude ;
O'Connor, James P. B. ;
Boellaard, Ronald ;
Thacker, Neil A. ;
Jackson, Alan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (04) :447-455
[5]   FACTOR-ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN PREDICTING THE RESPONSE OF OSTEOSARCOMA TO CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
BONNEROT, V ;
CHARPENTIER, A ;
FROUIN, F ;
KALIFA, C ;
VANEL, D ;
DIPAOLA, R .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1992, 27 (10) :847-855
[6]   Landscape ecology of mammals: Relationships between density and patch size [J].
Bowers, MA ;
Matter, SF .
JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1997, 78 (04) :999-1013
[7]   RECIST: right time to renovate? [J].
Burton, Adrian .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (06) :464-465
[8]   Characterization of Image Heterogeneity Using 2D Minkowski Functionals Increases the Sensitivity of Detection of a Targeted MRI Contrast Agent [J].
Canuto, Holly C. ;
McLachlan, Charles ;
Kettunen, Mikko I. ;
Velic, Marko ;
Krishnan, Anant S. ;
Neves, Andre A. ;
de Backer, Maaike ;
Hu, D-E. ;
Hobson, Michael P. ;
Brindle, Kevin M. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2009, 61 (05) :1218-1224
[9]   The Annotation and Image Mark-up Project [J].
Channin, David S. ;
Mongkolwat, Pattanasak ;
Kleper, Vladimir ;
Rubin, Daniel L. .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 253 (03) :590-592
[10]   Automatic tumor segmentation using knowledge-based techniques [J].
Clark, MC ;
Hall, LO ;
Goldgof, DB ;
Velthuizen, R ;
Murtagh, FR ;
Silbiger, MS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 17 (02) :187-201