Estimating the summertime tropospheric ozone distribution over North America through assimilation of observations from the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer

被引:61
作者
Parrington, M. [1 ]
Jones, D. B. A. [1 ]
Bowman, K. W. [3 ]
Horowitz, L. W. [2 ]
Thompson, A. M. [5 ]
Tarasick, D. W. [4 ]
Witte, J. C. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys, Toronto, ON M5S 1A7, Canada
[2] Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, NOAA, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[3] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[4] Environm Canada, Air Qual Res Div, Meteorol Serv Ctr, Downsview, ON M3H 5T4, Canada
[5] Penn State Univ, Dept Meteorol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[6] Sci Syst & Applicat Inc, Lanham, MD 20706 USA
[7] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2007JD009341
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
We assimilate ozone and CO retrievals from the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) for July and August 2006 into the GEOS-Chem and AM2-Chem models. We show that the spatiotemporal sampling of the TES measurements is sufficient to constrain the tropospheric ozone distribution in the models despite their different chemical and transport mechanisms. Assimilation of TES data reduces the mean differences in ozone between the models from almost 8 ppbv to 1.5 ppbv. Differences between the mean model profiles and ozonesonde data over North America are reduced from almost 30% to within 5% for GEOS-Chem, and from 40% to within 10% for AM2-Chem, below 200 hPa. The absolute biases are larger in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UT/LS), increasing to 10% and 30% in GEOS-Chem and AM2-Chem, respectively, at 200 hPa. The larger bias in the UT/LS reflects the influence of the spatial sampling of TES, the vertical smoothing of the TES retrievals, and the coarse vertical resolution of the models. The largest discrepancy in ozone between the models is associated with the ozone maximum over the southeastern USA. The assimilation reduces the mean bias between the models from 26 to 16 ppbv in this region. In GEOS-Chem, there is an increase of about 11 ppbv in the upper troposphere, consistent with the increase in ozone obtained by a previous study using GEOS-Chem with an improved estimate of lightning NOx emissions over the USA. Our results show that assimilation of TES observations into models of tropospheric chemistry and transport provides an improved description of free tropospheric ozone.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 60 条
[11]   Large upper tropospheric ozone enhancements above midlatitude North America during summer:: In situ evidence from the IONS and MOZAIC ozone measurement network [J].
Cooper, O. R. ;
Stohl, A. ;
Trainer, M. ;
Thompson, A. M. ;
Witte, J. C. ;
Oltmans, S. J. ;
Morris, G. ;
Pickering, K. E. ;
Crawford, J. H. ;
Chen, G. ;
Cohen, R. C. ;
Bertram, T. H. ;
Wooldridge, P. ;
Perring, A. ;
Brune, W. H. ;
Merrill, J. ;
Moody, J. L. ;
Tarasick, D. ;
Nedelec, P. ;
Forbes, G. ;
Newchurch, M. J. ;
Schmidlin, F. J. ;
Johnson, B. J. ;
Turquety, S. ;
Baughcum, S. L. ;
Ren, X. ;
Fehsenfeld, F. C. ;
Meagher, J. F. ;
Spichtinger, N. ;
Brown, C. C. ;
McKeen, S. A. ;
McDermid, I. S. ;
Leblanc, T. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2006, 111 (D24)
[12]   Global budget of CO, 1988-1997: Source estimates and validation with a global model [J].
Duncan, B. N. ;
Logan, J. A. ;
Bey, I. ;
Megretskaia, I. A. ;
Yantosca, R. M. ;
Novelli, P. C. ;
Jones, N. B. ;
Rinsland, C. P. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2007, 112 (D22)
[13]   Interannual and seasonal variability of biomass burning emissions constrained by satellite observations [J].
Duncan, BN ;
Martin, RV ;
Staudt, AC ;
Yevich, R ;
Logan, JA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D2)
[14]   Ozone episode analysis by four-dimensional variational chemistry data assimilation [J].
Elbern, H ;
Schmidt, H .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D4) :3569-3590
[15]   Variability in surface ozone background over the United States: Implications for air quality policy [J].
Fiore, A ;
Jacob, DJ ;
Liu, H ;
Yantosca, RM ;
Fairlie, TD ;
Li, Q .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D24)
[16]   Global distribution of tropospheric ozone from satellite measurements using the empirically corrected tropospheric ozone residual technique: Identification of the regional aspects of air pollution [J].
Fishman, J ;
Wozniak, AE ;
Creilson, JK .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2003, 3 :893-907
[17]   The ASSET intercomparison of ozone analyses: method and first results [J].
Geer, A. J. ;
Lahoz, W. A. ;
Bekki, S. ;
Bormann, N. ;
Errera, Q. ;
Eskes, H. J. ;
Fonteyn, D. ;
Jackson, D. R. ;
Juckes, M. N. ;
Massart, S. ;
Peuch, V. -H. ;
Rharmili, S. ;
Segers, A. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2006, 6 :5445-5474
[18]  
*GFDL GAMDT, 2003, J CLIMATOL, V17, P4641
[19]   Past, present, and future concentrations of tropospheric ozone and aerosols: Methodology, ozone evaluation, and sensitivity to aerosol wet removal [J].
Horowitz, Larry W. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2006, 111 (D22)
[20]   A global simulation of tropospheric ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2 [J].
Horowitz, LW ;
Walters, S ;
Mauzerall, DL ;
Emmons, LK ;
Rasch, PJ ;
Granier, C ;
Tie, XX ;
Lamarque, JF ;
Schultz, MG ;
Tyndall, GS ;
Orlando, JJ ;
Brasseur, GP .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D24)