Postoperative analgesia with no motor block by continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil after total hip replacement

被引:48
作者
Kampe, S
Weigand, C
Kaufmann, J
Klimek, M
König, DP
Lynch, O
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Dept Anesthesiol, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Dept Orthoped Surg, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199908000-00027
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We assessed the analgesic efficacy of postoperative epidural ropivacaine 0.1% with and without sufentanil 1 mu g/mL in this prospective, randomized, single-blinded study of 30 ASA physical status I-III patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. Lumbar epidural block using 0.75% ropivacaine was combined with either propofol sedation or general anesthesia for surgery. After surgery, the epidural infusion was commenced. Fifteen patients in each group received either an epidural infusion of 0.1% ropivacaine with 1 mu g/mL sufentanil (R+S) or 0.1% ropivacaine without sufentanil (R) at a rate of 5-9 mL/h. All patients had access to TV piritramide via a patient-controlled analgesia device. The R+S group consumed six times less piritramide over a 48-h infusion period than the R group (median 12.7 vs 73.0 mg; P < 0.001). Motor block was negligible for the study duration in both groups. Patient satisfaction was excellent. The incidence of adverse events, such as nausea, was similar. We conclude that a continuous epidural infusion of 0.1% ropivacaine with 1 mu g/mL sufentanil is more effective than ropivacaine alone in treating pain after elective hip replacement without motor block. Implications: This is the first randomized study comparing the efficacy of the epidural combination of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 1 mu g/mL, versus plain ropivacaine 0.1% in treating pain after hip replacement. We found that ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 1 mu g/mL led to a sixfold reduction in opioid requirements after total hip replacement by producing a negligible motor block.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 398
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
BADER AM, 1989, ANESTH ANALG, V68, P724
[2]  
BADNER NH, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V72, P337
[3]  
Bromage P R, 1965, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl, V16, P55
[4]   Epidural analgesia for labour and delivery: Fentanyl or sufentanil? [J].
Cohen, S ;
Amar, D ;
Pantuck, CB ;
Pantuck, EJ ;
Goodman, EJ ;
Leung, DHY .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1996, 43 (04) :341-346
[5]   SPINAL-CORD PHARMACOLOGY OF PAIN [J].
DICKENSON, AH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 75 (02) :193-200
[6]  
DICKENSON AH, 1993, CURRENT OPINION ANAE, V6, P861
[7]   A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF EPIDURAL SUFENTANIL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS SUFENTANIL OR EPIDURAL FENTANYL ANALGESIA AFTER MAJOR ABDOMINAL-SURGERY [J].
GELLER, E ;
CHRUBASIK, J ;
GRAF, R ;
CHRUBASIK, S ;
SCHULTEMONTING, J .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1993, 76 (06) :1243-1250
[8]  
LEATH S, 1994, BRIT J ANAESTH, V73, P552
[9]   EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE, SUFENTANIL OR THE COMBINATION FOR POSTTHORACOTOMY PAIN [J].
MOURISSE, J ;
HASENBOS, MAWM ;
GIELEN, MJM ;
MOLL, JE ;
CROMHEECKE, GJE .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 36 (01) :70-74
[10]   Postoperative analgesia by continuous extradural infusion of ropivacaine after upper abdominal surgery [J].
Schug, SA ;
Scott, DA ;
Payne, J ;
Mooney, PH ;
Hagglof, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 (04) :487-491