A comparison of multiway regression and scaling methods

被引:72
作者
Gurden, SP
Westerhuis, JA
Bro, R
Smilde, AK
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Chem Engn, NL-1018 WV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, Chemometr Grp, Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
multiway regression; scaling; PLS;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00168-X
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Recent years have seen an increase in the number of regression problems for which the predictor and/or response arrays have orders higher than two, i.e. multiway data. Examples are found in, e.g. industrial batch process analysis, chemical calibration using second-order instrumentation and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR). As these types of problems increase in complexity in terms of both the dimensions and the underlying structures of the data sets, the number of options with respect to different types of scaling and regression models also increases. In this article, three methods for multiway regression are compared: unfold partial least squares (PLS), multilinear PLS and multiway covariates regression (MCovR). All three methods differ either in the structural model imposed on the data or the way the model components are calculated. Three methods of scaling multiway arrays are also compared, along with the option of applying no scaling. Three data sets drawn from industrial processes are used in the comparison. The general conclusion is that the type of data and scaling used is more important than the type of regression model used in terms of predictive ability. The models do differ, however, in terms of interpretability. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 136
页数:16
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]  
BRO R, UNPUB CENTERING SCAL
[12]  
Broadhead T. O., 1985, MAKROMOL CHEM S, V10/11, P105
[13]  
Burnham AJ, 1999, J CHEMOMETR, V13, P49, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199901/02)13:1<49::AID-CEM531>3.0.CO
[14]  
2-K
[15]   ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING VIA AN N-WAY GENERALIZATION OF ECKART-YOUNG DECOMPOSITION [J].
CARROLL, JD ;
CHANG, JJ .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1970, 35 (03) :283-&
[16]  
de Jong S, 1998, J CHEMOMETR, V12, P77, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199801/02)12:1<77::AID-CEM496>3.0.CO
[17]  
2-7
[18]   PRINCIPAL COVARIATES REGRESSION .1. THEORY [J].
DEJONG, S ;
KIERS, HAL .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1992, 14 (1-3) :155-164
[19]   CROSS-VALIDATORY CHOICE OF THE NUMBER OF COMPONENTS FROM A PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS [J].
EASTMENT, HT ;
KRZANOWSKI, WJ .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1982, 24 (01) :73-77
[20]   PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES REGRESSION - A TUTORIAL [J].
GELADI, P ;
KOWALSKI, BR .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1986, 185 :1-17