A Prospectively Validated Clinical Risk Score Accurately Predicts Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy

被引:989
作者
Callery, Mark P. [1 ]
Pratt, Wande B. [2 ]
Kent, Tara S. [1 ]
Chaikof, Elliot L. [1 ]
Vollmer, Charles M., Jr. [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Barnes Jewish Hosp, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Hosp Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; COMPLICATIONS; RESECTION; OUTCOMES; DUCT; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; ADENOCARCINOMA; DEFINITIONS; STRATEGIES; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (CR-POPF) are serious inherent risks of pancreatic resection. Preoperative CR-POPF risk assessment is currently inadequate and rarely disqualifies patients who need resection. The best evaluation of risk occurs intraoperatively, and should guide fistula prevention and response measures thereafter. We sought to develop a risk prediction tool for CR-POPF that features intraoperative assessment and reveals associated clinical and economic significance. STUDY DESIGN: Based on International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula classification, recognized risk factors for CR-POPF (small duct, soft pancreas, high-risk pathology, excessive blood loss) were evaluated during pancreaticoduodenectomy. An optimal risk score range model, selected from 3 different constructs, was first derived (n = 233) and then validated prospectively (n = 212). Clinical and economic outcomes were evaluated across 4 ranges of scores (negligible risk, 0 points; low risk, 1 to 2; intermediate risk, 3 to 6; high risk, 7 to 10). RESULTS: Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas occurred in 13% of patients. The incidence was greatest with excessive blood loss. Duct size <5 mm was associated with increased fistula rates that rose with even smaller ducts. These factors, together with soft pancreatic parenchyma and certain disease pathologies, afforded a highly predictive 10-point Fistula Risk Score. Risk scores strongly correlated with fistula development (p<0.001). Notably, patients with scores of 0 points never developed a CR-POPF, while fistulas occurred in all patients with scores of 9 or 10. Other clinical and economic outcomes segregated by risk profile across the 4 risk strata. CONCLUSIONS: A simple 10-point Fistula Risk Score derived during pancreaticoduodenectomy accurately predicts subsequent CR-POPF. It can be readily learned and broadly deployed. This prediction tool can help surgeons anticipate, identify, and manage this ominous complication from the outset. (J Am Coll Surg 2013;216:1-14. (C) 2013 by the American College of Surgeons)
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Delayed recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A major factor impairing the delivery of adjuvant therapy?
    Aloia, Thomas E.
    Lee, Jeffrey E.
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    Abdalla, Eddie K.
    Wolff, Robert A.
    Varadhachary, Gauri R.
    Abbruzzese, James L.
    Crane, Christopher H.
    Evans, Douglas B.
    Pisters, Peter W. T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (03) : 347 - 355
  • [2] Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition
    Bassi, C
    Dervenis, C
    Butturini, G
    Fingerhut, A
    Yeo, C
    Izbicki, J
    Neoptolemos, J
    Sarr, M
    Traverso, W
    Buchler, M
    [J]. SURGERY, 2005, 138 (01) : 8 - 13
  • [3] Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection - The importance of definitions
    Bassi, C
    Butturini, G
    Molinari, E
    Mascetta, G
    Salvia, R
    Falconi, M
    Gumbs, A
    Pederzoli, P
    [J]. DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 21 (01) : 54 - 59
  • [4] Early Versus Late Drain Removal After Standard Pancreatic Resections Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial
    Bassi, Claudio
    Molinari, Enrico
    Malleo, Giuseppe
    Crippa, Stefano
    Butturini, Giovanni
    Salvia, Roberto
    Talamini, Giorgio
    Pederzoli, Paolo
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (02) : 207 - 214
  • [5] Prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas
    Brennan, MF
    Kattan, MW
    Klimstra, D
    Conlon, K
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 293 - 298
  • [6] Prevention and Management of Pancreatic Fistula
    Callery, Mark P.
    Pratt, Wande B.
    Vollmer, Charles M., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2009, 13 (01) : 163 - 173
  • [7] VALIDATION OF A COMBINED COMORBIDITY INDEX
    CHARLSON, M
    SZATROWSKI, TP
    PETERSON, J
    GOLD, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (11) : 1245 - 1251
  • [8] COPELAND GP, 1991, BRIT J SURG, V78, P356
  • [9] An Apgar score for surgery
    Gawande, Atul A.
    Kwaan, Mary R.
    Regenbogen, Scott E.
    Lipsitz, Stuart A.
    Zinner, Michael J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (02) : 201 - 208
  • [10] Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Risk factors and the impact of hospital volume
    Gouma, DJ
    van Geenen, RCI
    van Gulik, TM
    de Haan, RJ
    de Wit, LT
    Busch, ORC
    Obertop, H
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (06) : 786 - 794