Agricultural Biotechnology: The Promise and Prospects of Genetically Modified Crops

被引:111
作者
Barrows, Geoffrey [1 ]
Sexton, Steven [2 ]
Zilberman, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; BT CORN; RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT; GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT; FOOD SECURITY; IMPACT; HEALTH; PLANTS; PRODUCTIVITY; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1257/jep.28.1.99
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
For millennia, humans have modified plant genes in order to develop crops best suited for food, fiber, feed, and energy production. Conventional plant breeding remains inherently random and slow, constrained by the availability of desirable traits in closely related plant species. In contrast, agricultural biotechnology employs the modern tools of genetic engineering to reduce uncertainty and breeding time and to transfer traits from more distantly related plants. Critics express concerns that the technology imposes negative environmental effects and jeopardizes the health of those who consume the "frankenfoods." Supporters emphasize potential gains from boosting output and lowering food prices for consumers. They argue that such gains are achieved contemporaneous with the adoption of farming practices that lower agrochemical use and lessen soil. The extensive experience with agricultural biotechnology since 1996 provides ample evidence with which to test the claims of supporters and opponents and to evaluate the prospects of genetic crop engineering. In this paper, we begin with an overview of the adoption of the first generation of agricultural biotechnology crops. We then look at the evidence on the effects of these crops: on output and prices, on the environment, and on consumer health. Finally, we consider intellectual property issues surrounding this new technology.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 119
页数:21
相关论文
共 77 条
[21]   The public-private structure of intellectual property ownership in agricultural biotechnology [J].
Graff, GD ;
Cullen, SE ;
Bradford, KJ ;
Zilberman, D ;
Bennett, AB .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2003, 21 (09) :989-995
[22]   The contraction of agbiotech product quality innovation [J].
Graff, Gregory D. ;
Zilberman, David ;
Bennett, Alan B. .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 27 (08) :702-704
[23]   Excision of selectable marker genes from transgenic plants [J].
Hare, PD ;
Chua, NH .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 20 (06) :575-580
[24]   Insect-resistant GM rice in farmers' fields: Assessing productivity and health effects in China [J].
Huang, JK ;
Hu, RF ;
Rozelle, S ;
Pray, C .
SCIENCE, 2005, 308 (5722) :688-690
[25]   Enhancing the crops to feed the poor [J].
Huang, JK ;
Pray, C ;
Rozelle, S .
NATURE, 2002, 418 (6898) :678-684
[26]  
Jasa PJ, 2000, INT S CONS TILL MAZ, P24
[27]  
Just R.E., 2006, REGULATING AGR BIOTE
[28]   Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India [J].
Kathage, Jonas ;
Qaim, Matin .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (29) :11652-11656
[29]   Nutritional Labeling and Consumer Choices [J].
Kiesel, Kristin ;
McCluskey, Jill J. ;
Villas-Boas, Sofia B. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 3, 2011, 3 :141-158
[30]   Intellectual property - Plants and intellectual property: An international appraisal [J].
Koo, B ;
Nottenburg, C ;
Pardey, PG .
SCIENCE, 2004, 306 (5700) :1295-1297