On the value of large predators in Sweden:: A regional stratified contingent valuation analysis

被引:28
作者
Broberg, Thomas [1 ]
Brannlund, Runar [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Econ, SE-90187 Umea, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
willingness to pay; contingent valuation; predators; policy analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.05.016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 [工学]; 0830 [环境科学与工程];
摘要
This paper contributes With all applied policy analysis of the predator preservation policy in Sweden. We estimate the overall mean willingness to pay (WTP) for preserving the four large predators in the Swedish fauna by applying the contingent valuation method. Using Survey data from 2004 we find that 50 percent of the Swedish population is willing to contribute financially toward implementation of the predator policy package, and that the estimated overall mean WTP is approximately SEK 290. Further, we test for spatial differences in altitudes and WTP and find that respondents in Stockholm have the highest overall mean WTP, while respondents living in wolf-territories have the lowest. Our mean WTP measure is flawed with upward bias, since we cannot estimate the willingness to accept for those with clearly negative preferences regarding the predator policy package (e.g. hunters). In this paper, we set their WTP equal to zero. Thus. WC cannot rule out the possibility that the mean willingness to pay is, in fact, negative. i.e. the Social-value Of implementation the predator policy is negative. Finally. the estimates of the overall WTP arc sensitive to response-Uncertainty. When the respondents indicate uncertainty about their valuation. they tend to,,late higher values. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1066 / 1077
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
[Anonymous], TOPICS ENV EC
[2]
Attitudes toward wolves in southeastern Norway [J].
Bjerke, T ;
Reitan, O ;
Kellert, SR .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 1998, 11 (02) :169-178
[3]
BJERKE T, 2002, HUMAN ECOLOGY REV, V9, P55
[4]
BOSTEDT G, 2007, ENV RESOURC IN PRESS
[5]
A contingent valuation estimate of the benefits of wolves in Minnesota [J].
Chambers, CM ;
Whitehead, JC .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 26 (02) :249-267
[6]
Duffield JW, 1996, T N AM WILDL NAT RES, P285
[7]
Attitudes of hunters, locals, and the general public in Sweden now that the wolves are back [J].
Ericsson, G ;
Heberlein, TA .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 111 (02) :149-159
[8]
ERICSSON G, 2007, WILDLIFE BI IN PRESS
[9]
Multiple-bounded uncertainty choice data as probabilistic intentions [J].
Evans, MF ;
Flores, NE ;
Boyle, KJ .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2003, 79 (04) :549-560
[10]
Expansion versus density in Barcelona: A valuation exercise [J].
Garcia, D ;
Riera, P .
URBAN STUDIES, 2003, 40 (10) :1925-1936