Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer: A randomized multi center study

被引:46
作者
Bijen, Claudia B. M. [1 ]
Briet, Justine M. [1 ]
de Bock, Geertruida H. [2 ]
Arts, Henriette J. G. [1 ]
Bergsma-Kadijk, Johanna A. [2 ]
Mourits, Marian J. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Gynecol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
BMC CANCER | 2009年 / 9卷
关键词
ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; TRIAL; COST; LAPAROTOMY; MANAGEMENT; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-9-23
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Traditionally standard treatment for patients with early stage endometrial cancer (EC) is total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo oophorectomy (TAH+BSO) with or without lymph node dissection through a vertical midline incision. While TAH is an accepted effective treatment, it is highly invasive, visibly scarring and associated with morbidity. An alternative treatment is the same operation by laparoscopy. Though in several studies total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH+ BSO) seems a safe and feasible alternative approach in early stage endometrial cancer patients, there are no randomized data available yet. Furthermore, a randomized controlled trial with surgeons trained in laparoscopy is warranted in order to implement this technique in a safe manner. The aim of this study is to compare the treatment related morbidity, cost-effectiveness and quality of life in early stage endometrial cancer patients treated by laparoscopy versus the standard open approach. Methods: A multi centre randomized clinical phase 3 trial, including 5 university hospitals and 15 regional hospitals in the Netherlands. Only gynecologists trained in performing a TLH are allowed to participate. Inclusion criteria: Patients with a clinical stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma or complex atypical hyperplasia are randomized in a 2: 1 allocation to receive TLH or TAH. The main outcome measure is the rate of major complications, as assessed by an independent clinical review board. In total, 275 patients are required to have 80% power at alpha-0.05 to detect a significant difference of 15% complication rate. Secondary outcome measures are 1) costs and cost-effectiveness, 2) minor complications, and 3) quality of life. All data from this multi center study are reported using case record forms. Data regarding quality of life, pain, body Image, sexuality and additional homecare are assessed with self reported questionnaires. Discussion: A randomized multi center study in early stage endometrial cancer patients with inclusion criteria for patients and surgeons is designed and ongoing. Results will be presented at the end of 2009.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   A randomized trial with a cost-consequence analysis after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy [J].
Ellström, M ;
Ferraz-Nunes, J ;
Hahlin, M ;
Olsson, JH .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 91 (01) :30-34
[2]  
Eltabbakh GH, 2001, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V91, P378, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010115)91:2<378::AID-CNCR1012>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-F
[4]   Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stage I endometrial cancer [J].
Fram, KM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2002, 12 (01) :57-61
[5]  
GARRY R, 2004, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V1, P154
[6]   A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy [J].
Lumsden, MA ;
Twaddle, S ;
Hawthorn, R ;
Traynor, I ;
Gilmore, D ;
Davis, J ;
Deeny, M ;
Cameron, IT ;
Walker, JJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 107 (11) :1386-1391
[7]   Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal versus abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer - A prospective randomized trial [J].
Malur, S ;
Possover, M ;
Michels, W ;
Schneider, A .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 80 (02) :239-244
[8]   Total laparoscopic hysterectomy in the management of endometrial carcinoma [J].
Manolitsas, TP ;
McCartney, AJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2002, 9 (01) :54-62
[9]   Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study [J].
Marana, R ;
Busacca, M ;
Zupi, E ;
Garcea, N ;
Paparella, P ;
Catalano, GF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (02) :270-275
[10]   Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer [J].
Obermair, A ;
Manolitsas, TP ;
Leung, Y ;
Hammond, IG ;
McCartney, AJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2005, 15 (02) :319-324