Does ultra-low-dose CT with a radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral calculi?

被引:132
作者
Kluner, C
Hein, PA
Gralla, O
Hein, E
Hamm, B
Romano, V
Rogalla, P
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Inst Radiol, Dept Radiol, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Urol, Berlin, Germany
关键词
computed tomography (CT); radiation; exposure to patients and personnel; ultrasonography (US); ureteral calculi; renal calculi;
D O I
10.1097/01.rct.0000191685.58838.ef
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of multislice CT using a radiation dose equivalent to that of conventional abdominal x-ray (KUB). One hundred forty-two patients were prospectively examined with ultrasound and a radically dose-reduced CT protocol (120 kV, 6.9 eff. mAs). Number and size of calculi, presence of urinary obstruction, and alternative diagnoses were recorded and confirmed by stone removal/discharge or by clinical and imaging follow-up. The mean effective whole-body dose was 0.5 mSv in men and 0.7 mSv in women. The sensitivity and specificity in detecting patients with calculi was 97% and 95% for CT and 67% and 90% for ultrasound. Urinary obstruction was similarly assessed, whereas CT identified significantly more alternative diagnoses than ultrasound (P < 0.001). With regard to published data for standard-dose CT, the present CT protocol seems to be comparable in its diagnostic yield in assessing patients with calculi, and its radiation dose is equivalent to that of KUB.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 50
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
AROUA A, 2000, ENQUETE EXPOSITION R
[2]  
Becker C, 1999, ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG, V170, P99
[3]   Prospective study on ultrasonography plus plain radiography in predicting residual obstruction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones [J].
Cheung, MC ;
Leung, YL ;
Wong, BBW ;
Chu, SM ;
Lee, F ;
Tam, PC .
UROLOGY, 2002, 59 (03) :340-343
[4]   Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning [J].
Cohnen, M ;
Poll, LW ;
Puettmann, C ;
Ewen, K ;
Saleh, A ;
Mödder, U .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (05) :1148-1153
[5]   Unenhanced helical CT for renal colic - is the radiation dose justifiable? [J].
Denton, ERE ;
Mackenzie, A ;
Greenwell, T ;
Popert, R ;
Rankin, SC .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 54 (07) :444-447
[6]   Unenhanced helical CT using increased pitch for suspected renal colic: An effective technique for radiation dose reduction? [J].
Diel, J ;
Perlmutter, S ;
Venkataramanan, N ;
Mueller, R ;
Lane, MJ ;
Katz, DS .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2000, 24 (05) :795-801
[7]   Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: A replacement for excretory urography in planning treatment [J].
Fielding, JR ;
Silverman, SG ;
Samuel, S ;
Zou, KH ;
Loughlin, KR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (04) :1051-1053
[8]   Unenhanced helical computed tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain [J].
Hamm, M ;
Wawroschek, F ;
Weckermann, D ;
Knöpfle, E ;
Häckel, T ;
Häuser, H ;
Krawczak, G ;
Harzmann, R .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 39 (04) :460-465
[9]   Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: Review of all imaging modalities [J].
Heidenreich, A ;
Desgrandschamps, F ;
Terrier, F .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2002, 41 (04) :351-362
[10]   Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: Comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques [J].
Heneghan, JP ;
McGuire, KA ;
Leder, RA ;
DeLong, DM ;
Yoshizumi, T ;
Nelson, RC .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (02) :575-580