Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: Comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques

被引:111
作者
Heneghan, JP [1 ]
McGuire, KA
Leder, RA
DeLong, DM
Yoshizumi, T
Nelson, RC
机构
[1] Waterford Reg Hosp, Dept Radiol, Waterford, Ireland
[2] Duke Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC USA
关键词
computed tomography (CT); helical; kidney; calculi; phantoms; radiations; exposure to patients and personnel; ureter;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2292021261
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of unenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) performed at reduced milliampere-second, and therefore at a reduced patient radiation dose, by using conventional unenhanced helical CT as the standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with acute flank pain who weighed less than 200 lb (90 kg) were prospectively recruited for this study. Conventional helical CT scans were obtained with patients in the prone position by using 5-mm-thick sections, 140 kVp, 135-208 mAs (mean, 160 mAs), and a pitch of 1.5 (single-detector row CT) or 0.75 (multi-detector row CT, 4 x 5-mm detector configuration). Conventional CT was immediately followed by low-dose scanning, whereby the tube current was reduced to 100 mA (mean, 76 mAs). All other technical parameters and anatomic coverage remained constant. Three independent readers who were blinded to patient identity interpreted the scans in random order. The observers noted the location, size, and number of calculi; secondary signs of obstruction; and other clinically relevant findings. High- and low-dose scans were compared by using paired t tests and the signed rank test. RESULTS: Calculi were found in 33 (66%) patients; 25 (50%) had renal calculi and 19 (38%) had an obstructing ureteral calculus. The accuracy rates (averaged over the three readers) for determining the various findings on the low-dose scan compared with the high-dose scan were as follows: nephrolithiasis, 91 %; ureterolithiasis, 9490; obstruction, 91%; and normal findings, 92%. When interpretations between readers were compared, agreement rates were 90%-95% for standarddose scans and 90%-92% for reduced-dose scans (P >.5). Uncomplicated mild diverticulitis was found in three patients. No other clinically important abnormality was identified. A reduction in the tube current to 100 mA resulted in a dose reduction of 25% for multi-detector row CT and 42% for single-detector row CT. CONCLUSION: In patients who weighed less than 200 lb, unenhanced helical CT performed at a reduced tube current of 100 mA, and therefore at a reduced patient dose, resulted in scans of high accuracy. (C) RSNA, 2003.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 580
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Can noncontrast helical computed tomography replace intravenous urography for evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic? [J].
Chen, MYM ;
Zagoria, RJ .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 17 (02) :299-303
[2]  
Clopper CJ, 1934, BIOMETRIKA, V26, P404, DOI 10.2307/2331986
[3]   Unenhanced helical CT for renal colic - is the radiation dose justifiable? [J].
Denton, ERE ;
Mackenzie, A ;
Greenwell, T ;
Popert, R ;
Rankin, SC .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 54 (07) :444-447
[4]   Unenhanced helical CT using increased pitch for suspected renal colic: An effective technique for radiation dose reduction? [J].
Diel, J ;
Perlmutter, S ;
Venkataramanan, N ;
Mueller, R ;
Lane, MJ ;
Katz, DS .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2000, 24 (05) :795-801
[5]   Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: Strategies at a large children's hospital [J].
Donnelly, LF ;
Emery, KH ;
Brody, AS ;
Laor, T ;
Gylys-Morin, VM ;
Anton, CG ;
Thomas, SR ;
Frush, DP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :303-306
[6]  
ICRP, 1977, ICRP PUBL, V26, P1383
[7]   RADIATION-DOSE REDUCTION IN CT OF THE PEDIATRIC PELVIS [J].
KAMEL, IR ;
HERNANDEZ, RJ ;
MARTIN, JE ;
SCHLESINGER, AE ;
NIKLASON, LT ;
GUIRE, KE .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (03) :683-687
[8]   Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: Assessment off ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent [J].
Liu, WD ;
Esler, SJ ;
Kenny, BJ ;
Goh, RH ;
Rainbow, AJ ;
Stevenson, GW .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (01) :51-54
[9]   Urolithiasis: Detection and management with unenhanced spiral CT - A urologic perspective [J].
Preminger, GM ;
Vieweg, J ;
Leder, RA ;
Nelson, RC .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (02) :308-309
[10]   Radiation exposure and image quality in chest CT examinations [J].
Ravenel, J ;
Scalzetti, EM ;
Huda, W ;
Garrisi, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (02) :279-284