Radiation exposure and image quality in chest CT examinations

被引:128
作者
Ravenel, J [1 ]
Scalzetti, EM [1 ]
Huda, W [1 ]
Garrisi, W [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.177.2.1770279
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine how changes in radiographic tube current affect patient dose and image quality in unenhanced chest CT examinations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Ten sets of CT images were obtained from patients undergoing CT-guided chest biopsies. For each patient, six images of the same region were obtained at settings between 40 and 280 mAs. CT data were used to reconstruct tomographic sections with a field of view limited to the normal contralateral lung. Images were printed using lung and mediastinal image display settings. Image quality was determined by asking radiologists to assess the perceived level of mottle in CT images. Five chest radiologists ranked the relative image quality of six images. Patient effective doses were computed for chest CT examinations performed at each milliampere-second setting, Radiologists indicated whether any perceived improvement of image quality at the higher radiation exposures was worth the additional radiation dose. RESULTS. The differences in quality of chest CT images generated at greater than or equal to 160 mAs were negligible. Reducing the radiographic technique factor below 160 mAs resulted in a perceptible reduction in image quality. Differences in CT image quality for radiographic techniques between 120 and 280 mAs were deemed to be insufficient to justify any additional patient exposure. However, the use of 40 mAs results in an inferior image quality that would justify increased patient exposure. CONCLUSION. Radiographic techniques for unenhanced chest CT examinations can be reduced from 280 to 120 mAs without compromising image quality.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 284
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1991, Annals of the ICRP, V21
  • [2] The Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Research in CT and MR imaging: 2000 and beyond
    Balfe, DM
    Ehman, RL
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) : 561 - 564
  • [3] CHAMBERLAIN C, 1998, MED PHYS, V25, pA216
  • [4] *COM BIOL EFF ION, 1990, HLTH EFF EXP LOW LEV
  • [5] Pulmonary nodules: Experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT
    Diederich, S
    Lenzen, H
    Windmann, R
    Puskas, Z
    Yelbuz, TM
    Henneken, S
    Klaiber, T
    Eameri, M
    Roos, N
    Peters, PE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) : 289 - 298
  • [6] Image mottle in abdominal CT
    Ende, JF
    Huda, W
    Ros, PR
    Litwiler, AL
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1999, 34 (04) : 282 - 286
  • [7] Observer sensitivity to small differences: A multipoint rank-order experiment
    Good, WF
    Sumkin, JH
    Dash, N
    Johns, CM
    Zuley, ML
    Rockette, HE
    Gur, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (02) : 275 - 278
  • [8] HALL EJ, 1995, RADIOBIOLOGY RADIOLO, P448
  • [9] Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening
    Henschke, CI
    McCauley, DI
    Yankelevitz, DF
    Naidich, DP
    McGuinness, G
    Miettinen, OS
    Libby, DM
    Pasmantier, MW
    Koizumi, J
    Altorki, NK
    Smith, JP
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 354 (9173) : 99 - 105
  • [10] Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT
    Huda, W
    Scalzetti, EM
    Levin, G
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 (02) : 430 - 435