A quantitative study of ramped radio frequency, magnetization transfer, and slab thickness in three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in a patient population

被引:10
作者
Goodrich, KC
Blatter, DD
Parker, DL
Du, YPP
Meyer, KJ
Bernstein, MA
机构
[1] LATTER DAY ST HOSP,DEPT RADIOL,SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84143
[2] LATTER DAY ST HOSP,STAT DATA CTR,SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84143
[3] UNIV UTAH,DEPT RADIOL,SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84132
[4] UNIV UTAH,DEPT MED INFORMAT,SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84132
[5] UNIV UTAH,DEPT PHYS,SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84132
[6] GE CO,MED SYST,APPL SCI LAB,MILWAUKEE,WI 53201
关键词
magnetization transfer; ramped radio frequency; magnetic resonance angiography;
D O I
10.1097/00004424-199606000-00003
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The authors compare the effectiveness of various magnetic resonance (MR) angiography acquisition strategies in enhancing the visibility of small intracranial vessels. METHODS. Blood vessel contrast-to-noise ratio (MR) in time-of-flight MR angiography was studied as a function of vessel size and several selectable imaging parameters, Contrast-to-noise measurements were made on 257 vessel segments ranging in size from 0.3 mm to 4.2 mm in patients who recently had undergone intraarterial cerebral angiography. Imaging parameters studied included magnetization transfer, spatially variable radio frequency (RF) pulse profile (ramped RF), and imaging slab thickness. RESULTS. The combination of thin slabs (16 slices/slab), ramped RF, and magnetization transfer resulted in the highest CNR for all but the smallest vessel sizes, The smallest vessels (< 0.5 mm) had the highest CNR, using the thick slab (64 slices/slab) with ramped RF and magnetization transfer, Magnetization transfer always improved vessel CNR, but the improvement diminished as the slab thickness was reduced, The CNR increased with a decrease in slab thickness for all but the smallest vessel sizes. CONCLUSIONS. Overall, the results provide a quantitative demonstration that inflow enhancement of blood is reduced for small vessels, Thus, whereas magnetization transfer is important at all vessel sizes, it becomes the primary factor in improving the, visibility of the smallest vessels.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 332
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
BLATTER DD, 1994, P AM SOC NEUR ASNR 3
[2]   VOLUME RENDERING AND CONNECTIVITY ALGORITHMS FOR MR ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
CLINE, HE ;
DUMOULIN, CL ;
LORENSEN, WE ;
SOUZA, SP ;
ADAMS, WJ .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1991, 18 (02) :384-394
[3]   CONTRAST-TO-NOISE-RATIO MEASUREMENTS IN 3-DIMENSIONAL MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
DU, YP ;
PARKER, DL ;
DAVIS, WL ;
BLATTER, DD .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1993, 28 (11) :1004-1009
[4]   Experimental and theoretical studies of vessel contrast-to-noise ratio in intracranial time-of-flight MR angiography [J].
Du, YPP ;
Parker, DL ;
Davis, WL ;
Cao, G ;
Buswell, HR ;
Goodrich, KC .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1996, 6 (01) :99-108
[5]   IMPROVED TIME-OF-FLIGHT MR ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE BRAIN WITH MAGNETIZATION TRANSFER CONTRAST [J].
EDELMAN, RR ;
AHN, SS ;
CHIEN, D ;
WEI, L ;
GOLDMANN, A ;
MANTELLO, M ;
KRAMER, J ;
KLEEFIELD, J .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (02) :395-399
[6]   MEASUREMENT OF SIGNAL INTENSITIES IN THE PRESENCE OF NOISE IN MR IMAGES [J].
HENKELMAN, RM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1985, 12 (02) :232-233
[7]   THE EFFECTS OF LINEARLY INCREASING FLIP ANGLES ON 3D INFLOW MR-ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
NAGELE, T ;
KLOSE, U ;
GRODD, W ;
PETERSEN, D ;
TINTERA, J .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1994, 31 (05) :561-566
[8]   MR ANGIOGRAPHY BY MULTIPLE THIN SLAB 3D ACQUISITION [J].
PARKER, DL ;
YUAN, C ;
BLATTER, DD .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1991, 17 (02) :434-451
[9]   THE APPLICATION OF MAGNETIZATION-TRANSFER TO MR-ANGIOGRAPHY WITH REDUCED TOTAL POWER [J].
PARKER, DL ;
BUSWELL, HR ;
GOODRICH, KC ;
ALEXANDER, AL ;
KECK, N ;
TSURUDA, JS .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 34 (02) :283-286
[10]   MAGNETIZATION TRANSFER TIME-OF-FLIGHT MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
PIKE, GB ;
HU, BS ;
GLOVER, GH ;
ENZMANN, DR .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1992, 25 (02) :372-379