Long-term outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy using xenograft compared with synthetic mesh

被引:28
作者
Altman, D
Anzen, B
Brismar, S
Lopez, A
Zetterström, J
机构
[1] Danderyd Hosp, Pelv Floor Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Danderyd Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Div Obstet & Gynecol, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2005.10.034
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To assess the clinical outcome after abdominal sacrocolpopexy using a porcine dermal graft compared with a synthetic mesh. Methods. Patients with vaginal vault prolapse Stage II or worse (Baden-Walker staging), underwent sacrocolpopexy using a synthetic mesh (n = 25) or porcine collagen graft (n = 27). The subjective outcome was measured using validated questionnaires. Results. The mean clinical follow-up from surgery was 7.1 months for the xenograft compared with 7.4 months for the synthetic cohort. At clinical follow-up, vaginal vault prolapse Stage II was present in 8 (29%) of 27 patients in the xenograft cohort and 6 (24%) of 25 patients in the synthetic mesh cohort (no significant difference). The mean follow-up from surgery to survey was 2.5 years in the xenograft cohort and 4.3 years in the synthetic cohort. None of the patients in either cohort had undergone a secondary sacrocolpopexy. No significant differences were found between the cohorts regarding surgical morbidity other than more patients experiencing fever for I to 3 days in the xenograft cohort (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in lower urinary tract symptoms, anorectal symptoms, or quality-of-life variables between the two cohorts. Conclusions. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy using a porcine dermal graft was comparable to synthetic mesh in terms of subjective and anatomic outcomes at mid to long-term follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 724
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]   THE SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT OF VAGINAL VAULT PROLAPSE [J].
CREIGHTON, SM ;
STANTON, SL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (11) :1150-1154
[12]   A randomized controlled trial comparing fascia lata and synthetic mesh for sacral colpopexy [J].
Culligan, P ;
Blackwell, L ;
Goldsmith, LJ ;
Graham, CA ;
Rogers, A ;
Heit, MH .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 106 (01) :29-37
[13]   Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh [J].
Culligan, PJ ;
Murphy, M ;
Blackwell, L ;
Hammons, G ;
Graham, C ;
Heit, MH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (06) :1473-1480
[14]   Treatment of vaginal vault prolapse with abdominal sacral colpopexy using prolene mesh [J].
Diana, M ;
Zoppe, C ;
Mastrangeli, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (02) :126-128
[15]   Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression [J].
Dupont, WD ;
Plummer, WD .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1998, 19 (06) :589-601
[16]  
FERGUSON W H, 1964, Am Surg, V30, P227
[17]  
Fox AD, 2000, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V107, P1371
[18]   High complication rate identified in sacrocolpopexy patients attributed to silicone mesh [J].
Govier, FE ;
Kobashi, KC ;
Kozlowski, PM ;
Kuznetsov, DD ;
Begley, SJ ;
McGonigle, KF ;
Muntz, HG .
UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (06) :1099-1103
[19]   Development and validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of bowel and lower urinary tract symptoms in women [J].
Hiller, L ;
Radley, S ;
Mann, CH ;
Radley, SC ;
Begum, G ;
Pretlove, SJ ;
Salaman, JH .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 109 (04) :413-423
[20]   The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery [J].
Iglesia C.B. ;
Fenner D.E. ;
Brubaker L. .
International Urogynecology Journal, 1997, 8 (2) :105-115