Long-term outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy using xenograft compared with synthetic mesh

被引:28
作者
Altman, D
Anzen, B
Brismar, S
Lopez, A
Zetterström, J
机构
[1] Danderyd Hosp, Pelv Floor Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Danderyd Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Div Obstet & Gynecol, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2005.10.034
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To assess the clinical outcome after abdominal sacrocolpopexy using a porcine dermal graft compared with a synthetic mesh. Methods. Patients with vaginal vault prolapse Stage II or worse (Baden-Walker staging), underwent sacrocolpopexy using a synthetic mesh (n = 25) or porcine collagen graft (n = 27). The subjective outcome was measured using validated questionnaires. Results. The mean clinical follow-up from surgery was 7.1 months for the xenograft compared with 7.4 months for the synthetic cohort. At clinical follow-up, vaginal vault prolapse Stage II was present in 8 (29%) of 27 patients in the xenograft cohort and 6 (24%) of 25 patients in the synthetic mesh cohort (no significant difference). The mean follow-up from surgery to survey was 2.5 years in the xenograft cohort and 4.3 years in the synthetic cohort. None of the patients in either cohort had undergone a secondary sacrocolpopexy. No significant differences were found between the cohorts regarding surgical morbidity other than more patients experiencing fever for I to 3 days in the xenograft cohort (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in lower urinary tract symptoms, anorectal symptoms, or quality-of-life variables between the two cohorts. Conclusions. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy using a porcine dermal graft was comparable to synthetic mesh in terms of subjective and anatomic outcomes at mid to long-term follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 724
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   Uncomplicated erosion of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts into the rectum [J].
Kenton, KS ;
Woods, MP ;
Brubaker, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (01) :233-234
[22]   Dermal graft-augmented rectocele repair [J].
Kohli, N ;
Miklos, JR .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL AND PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION, 2003, 14 (02) :146-149
[23]  
LANE F, 1961, OBSTET GYNECOL, V20, P72
[24]   DERMAL COLLAGEN IMPLANTS [J].
OLIVER, RF ;
BARKER, H ;
COOKE, A ;
GRANT, RA .
BIOMATERIALS, 1982, 3 (01) :38-40
[25]   Mesh erosion into the bladder after abdominal sacral colpopexy [J].
Patsner, B .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (06) :1029-1029
[26]  
SNYDER TE, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V77, P944
[27]   SHORT FORMS TO ASSESS LIFE QUALITY AND SYMPTOM DISTRESS FOR URINARY-INCONTINENCE IN WOMEN - THE INCONTINENCE IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE AND THE UROGENITAL DISTRESS INVENTORY [J].
UEBERSAX, JS ;
WYMAN, JF ;
SHUMAKER, SA ;
MCCLISH, DK ;
FANTL, JA .
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 1995, 14 (02) :131-139
[28]   Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy [J].
Visco, AG ;
Weidner, AC ;
Barber, MD ;
Myers, ER ;
Cundiff, GW ;
Bump, RC ;
Addison, WA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 184 (03) :297-302
[29]   The use and misuse of prosthetic materials in reconstructive pelvic surgery: does the evidence support our surgical practice? [J].
Mark D. Walters .
International Urogynecology Journal, 2003, 14 (6) :365-366
[30]  
Williams D, 1998, MED DEVICE TECHNOL, V9, P10