Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide:: technical background, basic image quality parameters, and review of the literature

被引:38
作者
Völk, M
Hamer, OW
Feuerbach, S
Strotzer, M
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Regensburg, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Hosp Hohe Warte, Dept Radiol, D-95445 Bayreuth, Germany
关键词
digital radiography; flat-panel detector; experimental study; skeletal radiography; chest radiography; dose reduction;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-004-2243-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The two most frequently performed diagnostic X-ray examinations are those of the extremities and of the chest. Thus, dose reduction in the field of conventional skeletal and chest radiography is an important issue and there is a need to reduce man-made ionizing radiation. The large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide provides a significant reduction of radiation dose in skeletal and chest radiography compared with traditional imaging systems. This article describes the technical background and basic image quality parameters of this 43x43-cm digital system, and summarizes the available literature (years 2000-2003) concerning dose reduction in experimental and clinical studies. Due to its high detective quantum efficiency and dynamic range compared with traditional screen-film systems, a dose reduction of up to 50% is possible without loss of image quality.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 834
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography [J].
Bacher, K ;
Smeets, P ;
De Hauwere, A ;
Verstraete, K ;
Thierens, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (04) :923-929
[2]   Image quality vs radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study [J].
Geijer, H ;
Beckman, KW ;
Andersson, T ;
Persliden, J .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (09) :1704-1709
[3]   Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, X-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography:: Contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses [J].
Hamer, OW ;
Völk, M ;
Zorger, N ;
Feuerbach, S ;
Strotzer, M .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (04) :212-220
[4]   Digital radiography with a large-scale electronic flat-panel detector vs screen-film radiography: observer preference in clinical skeletal diagnostics [J].
Hamers, S ;
Freyschmidt, J ;
Neitzel, U .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (09) :1753-1759
[5]   Chest imaging with flat-panel detector at low and standard doses:: comparison with storage phosphor technology in normal patients [J].
Herrmann, KA ;
Bonél, H ;
Stäbler, A ;
Kulinna, C ;
Glaser, C ;
Holzknecht, N ;
Geiger, B ;
Schätzl, M ;
Reiser, MF .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (02) :385-390
[6]   Effective doses to members of the public from the diagnostic application of ionizing radiation in Germany [J].
Kaul, A ;
Bauer, B ;
Bernhardt, J ;
Nosske, D ;
Veit, R .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (07) :1127-1132
[7]   Digital radiography with large-area flat-panel detectors [J].
Kotter, E ;
Langer, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (10) :2562-2570
[8]   Lumbar spine radiography: Digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model [J].
Ludwig, K ;
Ahlers, K ;
Wormanns, D ;
Freund, M ;
Bernhardt, TM ;
Diederich, S ;
Heindel, W .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (01) :140-144
[9]   Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography [J].
Ludwig, K ;
Henschel, A ;
Bernhardt, TM ;
Lenzen, H ;
Wormanns, D ;
Diederich, S ;
Heindel, W .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (06) :1316-1323
[10]   Performance of a flat-panel detector in detecting artificial bone lesions: Comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography [J].
Ludwig, K ;
Lenzen, H ;
Kamm, KF ;
Link, TM ;
Diederich, S ;
Wormanns, D ;
Heindel, W .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 222 (02) :453-459