Decision support models for solid waste management: Review and game-theoretic approaches

被引:104
作者
Karmperis, Athanasios C. [1 ,2 ]
Aravossis, Konstantinos [1 ]
Tatsiopoulos, Ilias P. [1 ]
Sotirchos, Anastasios [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Mech Engn, Sect Ind Management & Operat Res, Athens 15780, Greece
[2] Minist Def, Hellen Army Gen Staff, Army Corps Engineers, Athens, Greece
关键词
Cost-benefit; Decision support framework; Game theory; Life-cycle; Multi-criteria decision-making; Waste management bargaining game; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; RISK-ASSESSMENT; CRITERIA; FUTURE; SYSTEMS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.017
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper surveys decision support models that are commonly used in the solid waste management area. Most models are mainly developed within three decision support frameworks, which are the life-cycle assessment, the cost-benefit analysis and the multi-criteria decision-making. These frameworks are reviewed and their strengths and weaknesses as well as their critical issues are analyzed, while their possible combinations and extensions are also discussed. Furthermore, the paper presents how cooperative and non-cooperative game-theoretic approaches can be used for the purpose of modeling and analyzing decision-making in situations with multiple stakeholders. Specifically, since a waste management model is sustainable when considering not only environmental and economic but also social aspects, the waste management bargaining game is introduced as a specific decision support framework in which future models can be developed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1290 / 1301
页数:12
相关论文
共 144 条
[31]   Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP [J].
De Feo, Giovanni ;
De Gisi, Sabino .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (11) :2370-2382
[32]   Public opinion and awareness towards MSW and separate collection programmes: A sociological procedure for selecting areas and citizens with a low level of knowledge [J].
De Feo, Giovanni ;
De Gisi, Sabino .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (06) :958-976
[33]   LCA-IWM: A decision support tool for sustainability assessment of waste management systems [J].
den Boer, J. ;
den Boer, E. ;
Jager, J. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 27 (08) :1032-1045
[34]   Burn or bury? A social cost comparison of final waste disposal methods [J].
Dijkgraaf, E ;
Vollebergh, HRJ .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 50 (3-4) :233-247
[35]   Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: Improving explorations of the future [J].
Duinker, Peter N. ;
Greig, Lome A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2007, 27 (03) :206-219
[36]  
EC, 2008, GUID COST BEN AN INV, p[13, 41, 99, 233]
[37]   What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management [J].
Ekvall, Tomas ;
Assefa, Getachew ;
Bjorklund, Anna ;
Eriksson, Ola ;
Finnveden, Goran .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 27 (08) :989-996
[38]  
EPA Environmental Protection Agency, 2006, EPA600R06060 SAIC
[39]   Multiple system modelling of waste management [J].
Eriksson, Ola ;
Bisaillon, Mattias .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (12) :2620-2630
[40]  
FINNVEDEN G., 2000, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V5, P229, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02979365