Decision support models for solid waste management: Review and game-theoretic approaches

被引:104
作者
Karmperis, Athanasios C. [1 ,2 ]
Aravossis, Konstantinos [1 ]
Tatsiopoulos, Ilias P. [1 ]
Sotirchos, Anastasios [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Mech Engn, Sect Ind Management & Operat Res, Athens 15780, Greece
[2] Minist Def, Hellen Army Gen Staff, Army Corps Engineers, Athens, Greece
关键词
Cost-benefit; Decision support framework; Game theory; Life-cycle; Multi-criteria decision-making; Waste management bargaining game; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; RISK-ASSESSMENT; CRITERIA; FUTURE; SYSTEMS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.017
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper surveys decision support models that are commonly used in the solid waste management area. Most models are mainly developed within three decision support frameworks, which are the life-cycle assessment, the cost-benefit analysis and the multi-criteria decision-making. These frameworks are reviewed and their strengths and weaknesses as well as their critical issues are analyzed, while their possible combinations and extensions are also discussed. Furthermore, the paper presents how cooperative and non-cooperative game-theoretic approaches can be used for the purpose of modeling and analyzing decision-making in situations with multiple stakeholders. Specifically, since a waste management model is sustainable when considering not only environmental and economic but also social aspects, the waste management bargaining game is introduced as a specific decision support framework in which future models can be developed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1290 / 1301
页数:12
相关论文
共 144 条
[71]   Comparison of waste prevention behaviors among three Japanese megacity regions in the context of local measures and socio-demographics [J].
Kurisu, Kiyo H. ;
Bortoleto, Ana Paula .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (07) :1441-1449
[72]   A cost-benefit analysis of a deposit-refund program for beverage containers in Israel [J].
Lavee, Doron .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (02) :338-345
[73]   Software architecture evaluation methods based on cost benefit analysis and quantitative decision making [J].
Lee, Jihyun ;
Kang, Sungwon ;
Kim, Chang-Ki .
EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2009, 14 (04) :453-475
[74]   Management of Uncertain Information for Environmental Systems Using a Multistage Fuzzy-Stochastic Programming Model with Soft Constraints [J].
Li, Y. P. ;
Huang, G. H. ;
Sun, W. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATICS, 2011, 18 (01) :28-37
[75]   Applying decision-making tools to national e-waste recycling policy: An example of Analytic Hierarchy Process [J].
Lin, Chun-hsu ;
Wen, Lihchyi ;
Tsai, Yue-mi .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (05) :863-869
[76]   From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: Recent developments and applications [J].
Linkov, I. ;
Satterstrom, F. K. ;
Kiker, G. ;
Batchelor, C. ;
Bridges, T. ;
Ferguson, E. .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 32 (08) :1072-1093
[77]  
Linkov I., 2004, COMP RISK ASSESSMENT
[78]   Coupling Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Life-Cycle Assessment, and Risk Assessment for Emerging Threats [J].
Linkov, Igor ;
Seager, Thomas P. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (12) :5068-5074
[79]   Weight-of-evidence evaluation in environmental assessment: Review of qualitative and quantitative approaches [J].
Linkov, Igor ;
Loney, Drew ;
Cormier, Susan ;
Satterstrom, F. Kyle ;
Bridges, Todd .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 407 (19) :5199-5205
[80]   Hydropower licensing and climate change: Insights from cooperative game theory [J].
Madani, Kaveh .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2011, 34 (02) :174-183