Effect of adherence to newly initiated antiretroviral therapy on plasma viral load

被引:171
作者
Gross, R
Bilker, WB
Friedman, HM
Strom, BL
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Div Infect Dis, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Educ & Res Therapeut, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
adherence; antiretroviral therapy; protease inhibitors; nelfinavir; viral load; CD4 cell count;
D O I
10.1097/00002030-200111090-00006
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether differences in adherence to newly initiated antiretroviral therapy exist between subjects who do and do not achieve undetectable plasma viral loads. Design: Observational cohort study monitoring adherence and virological and immunological parameters over the initial 4 months of therapy with nelfinavir. Adherence was measured using the microelectronic monitoring system (MEMS; APREX Corporation, Menlo Park, California, USA). Setting: General Clinical Research Center at a tertiary care center. Participants: Forty-one protease inhibitor-naive subjects with viral loads > 10000 copies/ml newly starting a regimen including nelfinavir, referred from HIV clinics in Philadelphia. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was undetectable viral load (< 50 copies/ml) after 4 months. Secondary measures included changes in viral load and CD4 cell counts. We hypothesized that adherence would be greater in subjects who achieved undetectable viral loads. Results: Adherence was greater in undetectable subjects, who took a median of 93% of prescribed doses [interquartile range (IQR) 84-96%], whereas detectable subjects took a median of 70% (IQR 46-93%). Adherence correlated with viral load decrease (Spearman's p = 0.38, P < 0.01) and CD4 cell count increase (Spearman's p = 0.25, P = 0.06). Despite differences between the groups over 4 months of therapy, there were no adherence differences over the first month [undetectables, 95% (IQR 88-98% ) versus detectables, 94% (IQR 87-98%), P > 0.50]. Conclusions: Adherence is important in determining whether or not individuals achieve suppression with a newly initiated antiretroviral regimen. Adherence begins to wane after the first month of therapy. Therefore, closer assessment of adherence particularly after this first month is important. (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:2109 / 2117
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [31] Comparing compliance patterns between randomized treatments
    Vrijens, B
    Goetghebeur, E
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1997, 18 (03): : 187 - 203
  • [32] Public health implications of antiretroviral therapy and HIV drug resistance
    Wainberg, MA
    Friedland, G
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (24): : 1977 - 1983
  • [33] ADHERENCE TO ZIDOVUDINE (AZT) AMONG HIV-INFECTED METHADONE PATIENTS - A PILOT-STUDY OF SUPERVISED THERAPY AND DISPENSING COMPARED TO USUAL CARE
    WALL, TL
    SORENSEN, JL
    BATKI, SL
    DELUCCHI, KL
    LONDON, JA
    CHESNEY, MA
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1995, 37 (03) : 261 - 269
  • [34] 1998, ANN INTERN MED, V128, P1057