Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) reproducibility: Implication of multiple injections

被引:153
作者
Chong, PK [1 ]
Gan, CS [1 ]
Pham, TK [1 ]
Wright, PC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Chem & Proc Engn, Biol & Environm Syst Grp, Sheffield S1 3JD, S Yorkshire, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
iTRAQ; mass spectrometer; multiple injections; double database search strategy; protein quantification; reproducibility;
D O I
10.1021/pr060018u
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We analyzed 10 isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) experiments using three different model organisms across the domains of life: Saccharomyces cerevisiae KAY446, Sulfolobus solfataricus P2, and Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. A double database search strategy was employed to minimize the rate of false positives to less than 3% for all organisms. The reliability of proteins with single-peptide identification was also assessed using the search strategy, coupled with multiple analyses of samples into LC-MS/MS. The outcomes of the three LC-MS/MS analyses provided higher proteome coverage with an average increment in total proteins identified of 6%, 33%, and 50% found in S. cerevisiae, S. solfataricus, and Synechocystis sp., respectively. The iTRAQ quantification values were found to be highly reproducible across the injections, with an average coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.09 (scattering from 0.14 to 0.04) calculated based on log mean average ratio for all three organisms. Hence, we recommend multiple analyses of iTRAQ samples for greater proteome coverage and precise quantification.
引用
收藏
页码:1232 / 1240
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[21]   A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics [J].
Liu, HB ;
Sadygov, RG ;
Yates, JR .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 76 (14) :4193-4201
[22]   Large-scale evaluation of quantitative reproducibility and proteome coverage using acid cleavable isotope coded affinity tag mass spectrometry for proteomic profiling [J].
Molloy, MP ;
Donohoe, S ;
Brzezinski, EE ;
Kilby, GW ;
Stevenson, TI ;
Baker, JD ;
Goodlett, DR ;
Gage, DA .
PROTEOMICS, 2005, 5 (05) :1204-1208
[23]   Qscore: An algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results [J].
Moore, RE ;
Young, MK ;
Lee, TD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2002, 13 (04) :378-386
[24]   Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data - The protein inference problem [J].
Nesvizhskii, AI ;
Aebersold, R .
MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2005, 4 (10) :1419-1440
[25]   Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: The yeast proteome [J].
Peng, JM ;
Elias, JE ;
Thoreen, CC ;
Licklider, LJ ;
Gygi, SP .
JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2003, 2 (01) :43-50
[26]   An optimized strategy for ICAT quantification of membrane proteins [J].
Ramus, C ;
de Peredo, AG ;
Dahout, C ;
Gallagher, M ;
Garin, J .
MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2006, 5 (01) :68-78
[27]   Large-scale proteomic analysis of the human splicesome [J].
Rappsilber, J ;
Ryder, U ;
Lamond, AI ;
Mann, M .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2002, 12 (08) :1231-1245
[28]   Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents [J].
Ross, PL ;
Huang, YLN ;
Marchese, JN ;
Williamson, B ;
Parker, K ;
Hattan, S ;
Khainovski, N ;
Pillai, S ;
Dey, S ;
Daniels, S ;
Purkayastha, S ;
Juhasz, P ;
Martin, S ;
Bartlet-Jones, M ;
He, F ;
Jacobson, A ;
Pappin, DJ .
MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2004, 3 (12) :1154-1169
[29]   i-Tracker:: For quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ™ -: art. no. 145 [J].
Shadforth, IP ;
Dunkley, TPJ ;
Lilley, KS ;
Bessant, C .
BMC GENOMICS, 2005, 6 (1)
[30]   Perturbation and interpretation of nitrogen isotope distribution patterns in proteomics [J].
Snijders, APL ;
de Koning, B ;
Wright, PC .
JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2005, 4 (06) :2185-2191