Thrombus detection in the left atrial appendage using contrast-enhanced MRI: A pilot study

被引:40
作者
Mohrs, OK
Nowak, B
Petersen, SE
Welsner, M
Rubel, C
Magedanz, A
Kauczor, HU
Voigtlaender, T
机构
[1] CCB, D-60389 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] German Canc Res Ctr, DKFZ, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Oxford, Ctr Clin MR Res, Oxford, England
关键词
atrial mass; atrium; MRI; thrombus; transesophageal echocardiography;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.04.1504
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. Left atrial thrombi are an important cause for embolism-related morbidity and mortality. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), the clinical reference, is semiinvasive; thus, we aimed to assess the value of contrast-enhanced cardiovascular MRI for the detection of thrombus in the left atrial appendage. CONCLUSION. The image quality was good for both 2D perfusion (grade 4 +/- 1) and 3D turbo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) (grade 4 +/- 1, n.s.). Compared with TEE. 2D perfusion, 3D turboFLASH, and the combination of both techniques yielded sensitivities of 47/35/44%, specificities of 50/67/67%, positive predictive values of 73/75/80%, and negative predictive values of 25/27/29%, respectively. The size of the thrombus was overestimated by 2D perfusion (66%) and by 3D turboFLASH (25%) and agreement for location and shape of thrombus was 50% and 75% for 2D perfusion and 75% and 50% for 3D turboFLASH, respectively. The TEE thrombus size was significantly larger in patients with true-positive diagnoses by 2D perfusion (148%) and by 3D turboFLASH (151%) when compared with patients with false-negative diagnoses (p < 0.05 for both). No such difference was found for image quality, time delay between TEE and MRI examination, and location and shape of thrombi. Contrast-enhanced MRI lacks diagnostic accuracy for the detection of thrombi in the left atrial appendage. Future technical improvements are essential to establish this technique as a noninvasive alternative to TEE.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 205
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Abe Y, 2003, CIRC J, V67, P203
[2]   Echocardiographic assessment of the left atrial appendage [J].
Agmon, Y ;
Khandheria, BK ;
Gentile, F ;
Seward, JB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 34 (07) :1867-1877
[3]   Detection and characterization of intracardiac thrombi on MR imaging [J].
Barkhausen, J ;
Hunold, P ;
Eggebrecht, H ;
Schüler, WO ;
Sabin, GV ;
Erbel, R ;
Debatin, JF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (06) :1539-1544
[4]   Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance - Are they interchangeable? [J].
Bellenger, NG ;
Burgess, MI ;
Ray, SG ;
Lahiri, A ;
Coats, AJS ;
Cleland, JGF ;
Pennell, DJ .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 (16) :1387-1396
[5]   MEDICAL PROGRESS - TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY [J].
DANIEL, WG ;
MUGGE, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 332 (19) :1268-1279
[6]  
Irani WN, 1997, CIRCULATION, V95, P962
[7]   LEFT-VENTRICULAR THROMBI - EVALUATION WITH SPIN-ECHO AND GRADIENT-ECHO MR IMAGING [J].
JUNGEHULSING, M ;
SECHTEM, U ;
THEISSEN, P ;
HILGER, HH ;
SCHICHA, H .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 182 (01) :225-229
[8]  
Maltagliati Anna, 2003, Ital Heart J, V4, P797
[9]   ACCURACY OF TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY FOR IDENTIFYING LEFT ATRIAL THROMBI - A PROSPECTIVE, INTRAOPERATIVE STUDY [J].
MANNING, WJ ;
WEINTRAUB, RM ;
WAKSMONSKI, CA ;
HAERING, JM ;
ROONEY, PS ;
MASLOW, AD ;
JOHNSON, RG ;
DOUGLAS, PS .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 123 (11) :817-+
[10]   Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale using contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI:: A pilot study [J].
Mohrs, OK ;
Petersen, SE ;
Erkapic, D ;
Rubel, C ;
Schräder, R ;
Nowak, B ;
Fach, WA ;
Kauczor, HU ;
Voigtlaender, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (01) :234-240