Evaluating short-term drug effects using a physician-specific prescribing preference as an instrumental variable

被引:264
作者
Brookhart, MA [1 ]
Wang, PS [1 ]
Solomon, DH [1 ]
Schneeweiss, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon,Dept Med, Boston, MA 02120 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.ede.0000193606.58671.c5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Postmarketing observational studies of the safety and effectiveness of prescription medications are critically important but fraught with methodological problems. The data sources available for such research often lack information on indications and other important confounders for the drug exposure under study. Instrumental variable methods have been proposed as a potential approach to control confounding by indication in nonexperimental studies of treatment effects; however, good instruments are hard to find. Methods: We propose an instrument for use in pharmacoepidermology that is based on a time-varying estimate of the prescribing physician's preference for one drug relative to a competing therapy. The use of this instrument is illustrated in a study comparing the effect of exposure to COX-2 inhibitors with nonselective, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications on gastrointestinal complications. Results: Using conventional multivariable regression adjusting for 17 potential confounders, we found no protective effect due to COX-2 use within 120 days from the initial exposure (risk difference = -0.06 per 100 patients; 95% confidence interval = -0.26 to 0.14). However, the proposed instrumental variable method attributed a protective effect to COX-2 exposure (-1.31 per 100 patients; -2.42 to -0.20) compatible with randomized trial results (-0.65 per 100 patients; -1.08 to -0.22). Conclusions: The instrumental variable method that we have proposed appears to have substantially reduced the bias due to unobserved confounding. However, more work needs to be done to understand the sensitivity of this approach to possible violations of the instrumental variable assumptions.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 275
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[21]   Approaches to combat with confounding by indication in observational studies of intended drug effects [J].
McMahon, AD .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2003, 12 (07) :551-558
[22]   Design issues for drug epidemiology [J].
McMahon, AD ;
MacDonald, TM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 50 (05) :419-425
[24]  
Miettinen O S, 1983, Stat Med, V2, P267, DOI 10.1002/sim.4780020222
[25]   Econometrics in outcomes research: The use of instrumental variables [J].
Newhouse, JP ;
McClellan, M .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1998, 19 :17-34
[26]   The effects of physician specialty and patient comorbidities on the use and discontinuation of coxibs [J].
Patino, FG ;
Allison, J ;
Olivieri, J ;
Mudano, A ;
Juarez, L ;
Person, S ;
Mikuls, TR ;
Moreland, L ;
Kovac, SH ;
Saag, KG .
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2003, 49 (03) :293-299
[27]   CHANNELING BIAS IN THE INTERPRETATION OF DRUG EFFECTS [J].
PETRI, H ;
URQUHART, J .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1991, 10 (04) :577-581
[28]   Positive predictive value of ICD-9 codes in the identification of cases of complicated peptic ulcer disease in the Saskatchewan Hospital automated database [J].
Raiford, DS ;
Gutthann, SP ;
Rodriguez, LAG .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 7 (01) :101-104
[29]   BIAS IN THE CODING OF HOSPITAL DISCHARGE DATA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR QUALITY ASSESSMENT [J].
ROMANO, PS ;
MARK, DH .
MEDICAL CARE, 1994, 32 (01) :81-90
[30]   ESTIMATING CAUSAL EFFECTS OF TREATMENTS IN RANDOMIZED AND NONRANDOMIZED STUDIES [J].
RUBIN, DB .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 66 (05) :688-701