Getting Explicit About the Implicit: A Taxonomy of Implicit Measures and Guide for Their Use in Organizational Research

被引:125
作者
Uhlmann, Eric Luis [2 ]
Leavitt, Keith [1 ]
Menges, Jochen I. [3 ]
Koopman, Joel
Howe, Michael [4 ]
Johnson, Russell E.
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Coll Business, Corvallis, OR 97330 USA
[2] HEC Paris, Jouy En Josas, France
[3] Univ Cambridge, Judge Business Sch, Cambridge, England
[4] Michigan State Univ, Dept Management, Eli Broad Coll Business, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
implicit measures; indirect measures; nonconscious processes; automaticity; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; ENTREPRENEURIAL TASK MOTIVATION; SOCIAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE; LINGUISTIC INTERGROUP BIAS; ACTIVATED RACIAL-ATTITUDES; EMOTIONAL STROOP TASK; AFFECTIVE SIMON TASK; ASSOCIATION TEST; SELF-ESTEEM; AUTOMATIC ASSOCIATIONS;
D O I
10.1177/1094428112442750
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Accumulated evidence from social and cognitive psychology suggests that many behaviors are driven by processes operating outside of awareness, and an array of implicit measures to capture such processes have been developed. Despite their potential application, implicit measures have received relatively modest attention within the organizational sciences, due in part to barriers to entry and uncertainty about appropriate use of available measures. The current article is intended to serve as an implicit measurement "toolkit" for organizational scholars, and as such our goals are fourfold. First, we present theory critical to implicit measures, highlighting advantages of capturing implicit processes in organizational research. Second, we present a functional taxonomy of implicit measures (i.e., accessibility-based, association-based, and interpretation-based measures) and explicate assumptions and appropriate use of each. Third, we discuss key criteria to help researchers identify specific implicit measures most appropriate for their own work, including a discussion of principles for the psychometric validation of implicit measures. Fourth, we conclude by identifying avenues for impactful "next-generation" research within the organizational sciences that would benefit from the use of implicit measures.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 601
页数:49
相关论文
共 223 条
[71]  
Fishbein M., 1975, BELIEF ATTITUDE INTE, DOI DOI 10.2307/2065853
[72]  
Fiske S. T., 1991, SOC COGNITION
[73]   When do associations matter? The use of automatic associations toward ethnic groups in person judgments [J].
Florack, A ;
Scarabis, M ;
Bless, H .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 37 (06) :518-524
[74]   Implicit and explicit personality: A test of a channeling hypothesis for aggressive Behavior [J].
Frost, Brian C. ;
Ko, Chia-Huei Emily ;
James, Lawrence R. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (05) :1299-1319
[75]   It's in the mind of the beholder: The impact of stereotypic associations on category-based and individuating impression formation [J].
Gawronski, B ;
Ehrenberg, K ;
Banse, R ;
Zukova, J ;
Klauer, KC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 39 (01) :16-30
[76]   On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes [J].
Gawronski, B ;
Strack, F .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 40 (04) :535-542
[77]  
Gawronski B., 2011, Cognitive methods in social psychology, P78
[78]   Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change [J].
Gawronski, Bertram ;
Bodenhausen, Galen V. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2006, 132 (05) :692-731
[79]   The Illusion of Will in Organizational Behavior Research: Nonconscious Processes and Job Design [J].
George, Jennifer M. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2009, 35 (06) :1318-1339
[80]   THE TROUBLE OF THINKING - ACTIVATION AND APPLICATION OF STEREOTYPIC BELIEFS [J].
GILBERT, DT ;
HIXON, JG .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 60 (04) :509-517