Interactions between electronic article surveillance systems and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

被引:43
作者
Groh, WJ
Boschee, SA
Engelstein, ED
Miles, WM
Burton, ME
Foster, PR
Crevey, BJ
Zipes, DP
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Krannert Inst Cardiol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Methodist Hosp, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] SW Florida Heart Grp, Ft Myers, FL USA
关键词
heart-assist device; cardioversion; defibrillation; electromagnetic fields; arrhythmia;
D O I
10.1161/01.CIR.100.4.387
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), inappropriate shocks have been reported with exposure to electronic article surveillance systems. The risk to patients with ICDs of walking through or lingering near surveillance systems requires further investigation, Methods and Results-We evaluated the response in ICD function in 170 subjects during a 10- to 15-second midgate walk-through of and during extreme (2 minutes within 6 in of the gate) exposure to 3 common article surveillance systems. Complete testing was done in 169 subjects. During a 10- to 15-second (very slow) walk-through of the 3 surveillance systems, no interactions were observed that would negatively affect ICD function. During extreme exposure (169 subjects) and during extreme exposure and pacing via the ICD (126 subjects), interactions between the ICD and the article surveillance systems were observed in 19 subjects. In 7 subjects, this interaction was clinically relevant and would have likely (3 subjects) and possibly (4 subjects) resulted in ICD shocks. In 12 subjects, the interaction was minor. Conclusions-It is safe for a patient with an ICD to walk through electronic article surveillance systems. Lingering in a surveillance system may result in an inappropriate ICD shock.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 392
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Beaugeard D, 1992, Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss, V85, P1457
[2]   ELECTRONIC ARTICLE SURVEILLANCE - A POSSIBLE DANGER FOR PACEMAKER PATIENTS [J].
DODINOT, B ;
GODENIR, JP ;
COSTA, AB ;
ZELLER, C ;
BROSCHART, M .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 16 (01) :46-53
[3]   THE EFFECTS OF ELECTRONIC ARTICLE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS AN PERMANENT CARDIAC-PACEMAKERS - AN IN-VITRO STUDY [J].
LUCAS, EH ;
JOHNSON, D ;
MCELROY, BP .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 17 (11) :2021-2026
[4]   Interaction between electronic article surveillance systems and implantable defibrillators: Insights from a fourth generation ICD [J].
Mathew, P ;
Lewis, C ;
Neglia, J ;
Krol, RB ;
Saksena, S .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 20 (11) :2857-2859
[5]   Environmental electromagnetic interference from electronic article surveillance devices: Interactions with an ICD [J].
McIvor, ME .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 18 (12) :2229-2230
[6]   Study of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator triggering by electronic article surveillance devices (SPICED TEAS) [J].
McIvor, ME ;
Reddinger, J ;
Floden, E ;
Sheppard, RC ;
Johnson, D ;
Becker, GI ;
Mayotte, M .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 21 (10) :1847-1861
[7]  
MUGICA J, 1997, STIMUCOEUR, V25, P287
[8]   Interference with an implantable defibrillator by an electronic antitheft-surveillance device [J].
Santucci, PA ;
Haw, J ;
Trohman, RG ;
Pinski, SL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (19) :1371-1374