Estimation of lumbar spine bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry:: standard anteroposterior scans vs sub-regional analyses of whole-body scans

被引:14
作者
Boyanov, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Sofia, Endocrinol Clin, Alexandrovska Hosp, BG-1431 Sofia, Bulgaria
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr/22307093
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (anteroposterior (AP) L(1)-L(4) DXA) is one of the standards for testing bone density (BMD). Whole-body (WB) DXA scanning allows analysis of the L-spine (WB-LS). The objective of this study was (i) to predict the AP L1-L4 BMD from the WB-LS BMD, and (ii) to compare WB and AP L1-L4 T-scores. 132 women participated in the study (age, 50.84 +/- 9.69 years; range, 21-74 years). AP L(1)-L(4) BMD was measured on a Hologic QDR 4500-A densitometer, and was followed by a WB scan. Linear regression analyses and curve estimations were performed for area, bone mineral content (BMC), BMD and T-scores. Precision errors for BMD from AP scans and WB-LS scans were 1.37% and 1.65%, respectively. The best linear correlations were found for BMD, followed by the T-scores (R = 0.882 and 0.871; p < 0.001). A power model for BMC (R(2) = 0.630) and a model S for BMD and the scanned area (R(2) = 0.841 and 0.539) were built. Discordant classification between AP L1-L4 and WB T-scores was found in 12.73% and 19.09% cases, respectively. WB T-score cut-off values of -2.35 and -0.90 produced the best sensitivity-to-specificity ratio in the diagnosis of lumbar spine osteoporosis and low bone mass. In conclusion, WB-LS analysis may provide data for the indirect estimation of spinal BMD. (C) 2008 The British Institute of Radiology.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 642
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   REGIONAL VARIATIONS IN BONE-MINERAL DENSITY AS ASSESSED WITH DUAL-ENERGY PHOTON-ABSORPTIOMETRY AND DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY [J].
FEYERABEND, AJ ;
LEAR, JL .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (02) :467-469
[2]   Total body and regional bone mineral densitometry (BMD) and soft tissue measurements: Correlations of BMD parameter to lumbar spine and hip [J].
Franck, H ;
Munz, M .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 67 (02) :111-115
[3]   ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF PRECISION ERRORS - HOW TO MEASURE THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF BONE DENSITOMETRY TECHNIQUES [J].
GLUER, CC ;
BLAKE, G ;
LU, Y ;
BLUNT, BA ;
JERGAS, M ;
GENANT, HK .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 5 (04) :262-270
[4]   Regional bone mass measurement from whole-body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scan [J].
Hammami, M ;
Koo, KWM ;
Koo, WWK ;
Thomas, RT ;
Rakhman, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2001, 4 (02) :131-136
[5]   Comparison of absorptiometric evaluations from total-body and local-region skeletal scans [J].
Hangartner, TN ;
Skugor, M ;
Landoll, JD ;
Matkovic, V .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2000, 3 (03) :215-225
[6]  
Hologic Q. D. R, 1996, 4500 XRAY BONE DENSI
[7]  
JELIC T, 1993, J BONE MINER RES, V8, pS347
[8]  
Leib E, 2004, J CLIN DENSITOM, V7, P27
[9]   Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry [J].
Leib, ES ;
Lewiecki, EM ;
Binkley, N ;
Hamdy, RC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2004, 7 (01) :1-5
[10]  
LLOYD T, 1992, J NUCL MED, V33, P1143