In silico modelling of directed evolution: Implications for experimental design and stepwise evolution

被引:24
作者
Wedge, David C. [1 ,3 ]
Rowe, William [1 ,3 ]
Kell, Douglas B. [1 ,3 ]
Knowles, Joshua [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Interdisciplinary Bioctr, Manchester M1 7ND, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Comp Sci, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Chem, Manchester M13, Lancs, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Genetic algorithm; Fitness landscape; NK-landscape; Selection pressure; Mutation rate; RANDOM MUTAGENESIS; PROTEIN EVOLUTION; FITNESS LANDSCAPE; VITRO EVOLUTION; SUBTILISIN-E; ENZYME; RECOMBINATION; STRATEGIES; ALGORITHM; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.11.005
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We model the process of directed evolution (DE) in silico using genetic algorithms. Making use of the NK fitness landscape model, we analyse the effects of mutation rate, crossover and selection pressure on the performance of DE. A range of values of K, the epistatic interaction of the landscape, are considered, and high- and low-throughput modes of evolution are compared. Our findings suggest that for runs of or around ten generations' duration-as is typical in DE-there is little difference between the way in which DE needs to be configured in the high- and low-throughput regimes, nor across different degrees of landscape epistasis. In all cases, a high selection pressure (but not an extreme one) combined with a moderately high mutation rate works best, while crossover provides some benefit but only on the less rugged landscapes. These genetic algorithms were also compared with a "model-based approach" from the literature, which uses sequential fixing of the problem parameters based on fitting a linear model. Overall, we find that purely evolutionary techniques fare better than do model-based approaches across all but the smoothest landscapes. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 141
页数:11
相关论文
共 88 条
[31]   Systematic variation of amino acid substitutions for stringent assessment of pairwise covariation [J].
Govindarajan, S ;
Ness, JE ;
Kim, S ;
Mundorff, EC ;
Minshull, J ;
Gustafsson, C .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2003, 328 (05) :1061-1069
[32]   Experimental Rugged Fitness Landscape in Protein Sequence Space [J].
Hayashi, Yuuki ;
Aita, Takuyo ;
Toyota, Hitoshi ;
Husimi, Yuzuru ;
Urabe, Itaru ;
Yomo, Tetsuya .
PLOS ONE, 2006, 1 (01)
[33]  
HECKENDORN RB, 1997, P 7 INT C GEN ALG E
[34]  
Heckendorn Robert B., 1998, FDN GENETIC ALGORITH, P183
[35]   A novel method of screening thrombin-inhibiting DNA aptamers using an evolution-mimicking algorithm [J].
Ikebukuro, K ;
Okumura, Y ;
Sumikura, K ;
Karube, I .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2005, 33 (12) :1-7
[36]   Evolutional design of a hyperactive cysteine- and methionine-free mutant of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase [J].
Iwakura, M ;
Maki, K ;
Takahashi, H ;
Takenawa, T ;
Yokota, A ;
Katayanagi, K ;
Kamiyama, T ;
Gekko, K .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 281 (19) :13234-13246
[37]   Directed evolution of a thermostable phosphite dehydrogenase for NAD(P)H regeneration [J].
Johannes, TW ;
Woodyer, RD ;
Zhao, HM .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 71 (10) :5728-5734
[38]   IN-VITRO EVOLUTION OF NUCLEIC-ACIDS [J].
JOYCE, GF .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1994, 4 (03) :331-336
[39]   DNA family shuffling of hyperthermostable β-glycosidases [J].
Kaper, T ;
Brouns, SJJ ;
Geerling, ACM ;
De Vos, WM ;
Van der Oost, J .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 368 :461-470
[40]  
Kauffman S.A., 1989, LECT SCI COMPLEXITY, P527