Efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets compared with PEG solution in colon cleansing: two identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase III trials

被引:111
作者
Kastenberg, D
Chasen, R
Choudhary, C
Riff, D
Steinberg, S
Weiss, E
Wruble, L
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Maryland Digest Dis Ctr, Laurel, MD USA
[3] Associated Gastroenterol Med Grp, Anaheim, CA USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[5] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Ft Lauderdale, FL USA
[6] Mid S Clin Res Inst, Memphis, TN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mge.2001.119733
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Liquid purgatives for cleansing before colonoscopy often are poorly tolerated. A sodium phosphate tablet has been developed to! provide equivalent efficacy with better patient tolerance. These 2 studies compare the safety, efficacy, and patient acceptance of the tablet (Visicol) to a polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution in adults undergoing colonoscopy. Methods: Two identically designed, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter trials:were performed. The primary efficacy variable was the overall quality of colon cleansing. Patient tolerance was assessed in terms of compliance with, the dosing regimen. Safety assessments included recording of adverse events and changes in biochemical tests, electrocardiogram, and vital signs. Results: Eight hundred forty-five patients participated in the studies; 420 took sodium phosphate tablets and 425 took a PEG solution. The 2 methods of preparation were equivalent in the overall quality of colon cleansing, cleansing in the right colon, and the frequency of inadequate preparation. Overall cleansing was excellent or good in 84.3% of patients in the tablet group and in 76.7% in the PEG group. Patient compliance was greater in the tablet group. There were also significantly fewer GI side effects in this group. Conclusions: Sodium phosphate tablets, compared with PEG solution, produce equivalent colon cleansing, are associated with fewer GI side effects, and are better tolerated by patients.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 713
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING A NEW SODIUM PHOSPHATE-BISACODYL REGIMEN WITH CONVENTIONAL PEG-ES LAVAGE FOR OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY PREPARATION [J].
AFRIDI, SA ;
BARTHEL, JS ;
KING, PD ;
PINEDA, JJ ;
MARSHALL, JB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (05) :485-489
[2]  
Am. Soc. Gastrointest. Endos, 1998, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, P691
[3]  
Aronchick C., 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P2667
[4]   A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda [J].
Aronchick, CA ;
Lipshutz, WH ;
Wright, SH ;
Dufrayne, F ;
Bergman, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (03) :346-352
[5]  
*CDCP, 1999, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V48, P116
[6]   Oral sodium phosphate versus sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in outpatient preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective comparison [J].
Clarkston, WK ;
Tsen, TN ;
Dies, DF ;
Schratz, CL ;
Vaswani, SK ;
Bjerregaard, P .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 43 (01) :42-48
[7]   PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, ENDOSCOPIC-BLINDED TRIAL COMPARING PRECOLONOSCOPY BOWEL CLEANSING METHODS [J].
COHEN, SM ;
WEXNER, SD ;
BINDEROW, SR ;
NOGUERAS, JJ ;
DANIEL, N ;
EHRENPREIS, ED ;
JENSEN, J ;
BONNER, GF ;
RUDERMAN, WB .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1994, 37 (07) :689-696
[8]   Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy [J].
Frommer, D .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (01) :100-104
[9]  
HARDCASTLE JD, 1996, LANCET, V348, P1462
[10]   Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings [J].
Imperiale, TF ;
Wagner, DR ;
Lin, CY ;
Larkin, GN ;
Rogge, JD ;
Ransohoff, DF .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (03) :169-174