Greenhouse gas emissions from two soils receiving nitrogen fertilizer and swine manure slurry

被引:76
作者
Jarecki, Marek K. [1 ]
Parkin, Timothy B. [4 ]
Chan, Alvarus S. K. [2 ]
Hatfield, Jerry L. [4 ]
Jones, Raymond [3 ]
机构
[1] AgCert USA, Natl Soil Tilth Lab, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] AgCert USA, Melbourne, FL 32904 USA
[3] AgCert Canada Co, High River, AB T1V 1M5, Canada
[4] USDA ARS, Natl Soil Tilth Lab, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2007.0427
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The interactive effects of soil texture and type of N fertility (i.e., manure vs. commercial N fertilizer) on N2O and CH4 emissions have not been well established. This study was conducted to assess the impact of soil type and N fertility on greenhouse gas fluxes (N2O, CH4, and CO2) from the soil surface. The soils used were a sandy loam (789 g kg(-1) sand and 138 g kg(-1) clay) and a clay soil (216 g kg(-1) sand, and 415 g kg(-1) clay). Chamber experiments were conducted using plastic buckets as the experimental units. The treatments applied to each soil type were: (i) control (no added N), (ii) urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN), and (iii) liquid swine manure slurry Greenhouse gas fluxes were measured over 8 weeks. Within the UAN and swine manure treatments both N2O and CH4 emissions were greater in the sandy loam than in the clay soil. In the sandy loam soil N2O emissions were significantly different among all N treatments, but in the clay soil only the manure treatment had significantly higher N2O emissions. It is thought that the major differences between the two soils controlling both N2O and CH4 emissions were cation exchange capacity (CEC) and percent water-filled pore space (%WFPS). We speculate that the higher CEC in the clay soil reduced N availability through increased adsorption of NH4+. compared to the sandy loam soil. In addition the higher average %WFPS in the sandy loam may have favored higher denitrification and CH4 production than in the clay soil.
引用
收藏
页码:1432 / 1438
页数:7
相关论文
共 63 条
[51]   The effect of agriculture on methane oxidation in soil [J].
Powlson, DS ;
Goulding, KWT ;
Willison, TW ;
Webster, CP ;
Hutsch, BW .
NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 1997, 49 (1-3) :59-70
[52]   Soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics following application of pig slurry for the 19th consecutive year:: II.: Nitrous oxide fluxes and mineral nitrogen [J].
Rochette, P ;
van Bochove, E ;
Prévost, D ;
Angers, DA ;
Côté, D ;
Bertrand, N .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2000, 64 (04) :1396-1403
[53]   Microbial community structure and global trace gases [J].
Schimel, JP ;
Gulledge, J .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 1998, 4 (07) :745-758
[54]   Ammonia, methane, and nitrous oxide emission from pig slurry applied to a pasture in New Zealand [J].
Sherlock, RR ;
Sommer, SG ;
Khan, RZ ;
Wood, CW ;
Guertal, EA ;
Freney, JR ;
Dawson, CO ;
Cameron, KC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2002, 31 (05) :1491-1501
[55]   Oxidation of atmospheric methane in Northern European soils, comparison with other ecosystems, and uncertainties in the global terrestrial sink [J].
Smith, KA ;
Dobbie, KE ;
Ball, BC ;
Bakken, LR ;
Sitaula, BK ;
Hansen, S ;
Brumme, R ;
Borken, W ;
Christensen, S ;
Priemé, A ;
Fowler, D ;
Macdonald, JA ;
Skiba, U ;
Klemedtsson, L ;
Kasimir-Klemedtsson, A ;
Degórska, A ;
Orlanski, P .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2000, 6 (07) :791-803
[56]   Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from pig slurry amended soils [J].
Sommer, SG ;
Sherlock, RR ;
Khan, RZ .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 28 (10-11) :1541-1544
[57]  
*SPSS INC, 1997, SIGMASTAT 2 03 WIND
[58]   INFLUENCE OF NITROGEN-FERTILIZATION ON METHANE UPTAKE IN TEMPERATE FOREST SOILS [J].
STEUDLER, PA ;
BOWDEN, RD ;
MELILLO, JM ;
ABER, JD .
NATURE, 1989, 341 (6240) :314-316
[59]   Methane oxidation in forest, successional, and no-till agricultural ecosystems: Effects of nitrogen and soil disturbance [J].
Suwanwaree, P ;
Robertson, GP .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2005, 69 (06) :1722-1729
[60]  
*USDA, 1981, SOIL SURV BOON COUNT