Greenhouse gas emissions from two soils receiving nitrogen fertilizer and swine manure slurry

被引:76
作者
Jarecki, Marek K. [1 ]
Parkin, Timothy B. [4 ]
Chan, Alvarus S. K. [2 ]
Hatfield, Jerry L. [4 ]
Jones, Raymond [3 ]
机构
[1] AgCert USA, Natl Soil Tilth Lab, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] AgCert USA, Melbourne, FL 32904 USA
[3] AgCert Canada Co, High River, AB T1V 1M5, Canada
[4] USDA ARS, Natl Soil Tilth Lab, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2007.0427
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The interactive effects of soil texture and type of N fertility (i.e., manure vs. commercial N fertilizer) on N2O and CH4 emissions have not been well established. This study was conducted to assess the impact of soil type and N fertility on greenhouse gas fluxes (N2O, CH4, and CO2) from the soil surface. The soils used were a sandy loam (789 g kg(-1) sand and 138 g kg(-1) clay) and a clay soil (216 g kg(-1) sand, and 415 g kg(-1) clay). Chamber experiments were conducted using plastic buckets as the experimental units. The treatments applied to each soil type were: (i) control (no added N), (ii) urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN), and (iii) liquid swine manure slurry Greenhouse gas fluxes were measured over 8 weeks. Within the UAN and swine manure treatments both N2O and CH4 emissions were greater in the sandy loam than in the clay soil. In the sandy loam soil N2O emissions were significantly different among all N treatments, but in the clay soil only the manure treatment had significantly higher N2O emissions. It is thought that the major differences between the two soils controlling both N2O and CH4 emissions were cation exchange capacity (CEC) and percent water-filled pore space (%WFPS). We speculate that the higher CEC in the clay soil reduced N availability through increased adsorption of NH4+. compared to the sandy loam soil. In addition the higher average %WFPS in the sandy loam may have favored higher denitrification and CH4 production than in the clay soil.
引用
收藏
页码:1432 / 1438
页数:7
相关论文
共 63 条
[41]   EFFECT OF WATER-FILLED PORE-SPACE ON CARBON-DIOXIDE AND NITROUS-OXIDE PRODUCTION IN TILLED AND NONTILLED SOILS [J].
LINN, DM ;
DORAN, JW .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1984, 48 (06) :1267-1272
[42]   Fluxes of nitrous oxide and nitric oxide from experimental excreta patches in boreal agricultural soil [J].
Maljanen, Maria ;
Martikkala, Mika ;
Koponen, Hannu T. ;
Virkajarvi, Perttu ;
Martikainen, Pertti J. .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2007, 39 (04) :914-920
[43]   Nonlinear response of N2O flux to incremental fertilizer addition in a continuous maize (Zea mays L.) cropping system [J].
McSwiney, CP ;
Robertson, GP .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2005, 11 (10) :1712-1719
[44]   Ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions from two acidic soils of Nova Scotia fertilised with liquid hog manure mixed with or without dicyandiamide [J].
Mkhabela, M. S. ;
Gordon, R. ;
Burton, D. ;
Madani, A. ;
Hart, W. ;
Elmi, A. .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2006, 65 (08) :1381-1387
[45]   METHANE AND NITROUS-OXIDE FLUXES IN NATIVE, FERTILIZED AND CULTIVATED GRASSLANDS [J].
MOSIER, A ;
SCHIMEL, D ;
VALENTINE, D ;
BRONSON, K ;
PARTON, W .
NATURE, 1991, 350 (6316) :330-332
[46]   NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS FROM BARLEY PLOTS TREATED WITH AMMONIUM-NITRATE OR SEWAGE-SLUDGE [J].
MOSIER, AR ;
HUTCHINSON, GL ;
SABEY, BR ;
BAXTER, J .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1982, 11 (01) :78-81
[47]   Assessing and mitigating N2O emissions from agricultural soils [J].
Mosier, AR ;
Duxbury, JM ;
Freney, JR ;
Heinemeyer, O ;
Minami, K .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1998, 40 (01) :7-38
[48]  
MOSIER AR, 2007, BIODIVERSITY AGR PRO, P317
[49]  
NISHANTHA WAR, 2005, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V69, P1057
[50]   Nitrous oxide emissions from manure and inorganic fertilizers applied to spring barley [J].
Petersen, SO .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1999, 28 (05) :1610-1618