Protection of distal embolization in high-risk patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (PREMIAR)

被引:55
作者
Cura, Fernando A. [1 ]
Escudero, Alejandro Garcia
Berrocal, Daniel
Mendiz, Oscar
Trivi, Marcelo S.
Fernandez, Juan
Palacios, Alejandro
Albertal, Mariano
Piraino, Ruben
Riccitelli, Miguel Angel
Gruberg, Luis
Ballarino, Miguel
Milei, Jose
Baeza, Ricardo
Thierer, Jorge
Grinfeld, Liliana
Krucoff, Mitchell
O'Neill, William
Belardi, Jorge
机构
[1] Inst Cardiovasc Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Sanatorio Plaza Rosario, Rosario, Argentina
[3] Hosp Privado, Cordoba, Argentina
[4] Inst Invest Cardiol, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[5] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[6] Beaumont Hosp, Royal Oak, MI USA
[7] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Haifa, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.08.038
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Distal embolization may decrease myocardial reperfusion after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Nonetheless, results of previous trials assessing the role of distal protection during primary PCI have been controversial. The Protection of Distal Embolization in High-Risk Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Trial (PREMIAR) was a prospective, randomized, controlled study designed to evaluate the role of filter-based distal protection during PCI in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at high risk of embolic events (including only baseline Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 0 to 2 flow). The primary end point was continuous monitoring of ST-segment resolution. Secondary end points included core laboratory analysis of angiographic myocardial blush, ejection fraction measured by cardiac ultrasound, and adverse cardiac events at 6 months. From a total of 194 enrolled patients, 140 subjects were randomized to PCI with or without embolic protection, and 54 were included in a registry arm due to the presence of angiographic exclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics were comparable between arms. The rate of complete ST-segment resolution (>= 70%) at 60 minutes was similar in patients treated with or without distal protection (61.2% vs 60.3%, respectively, p = 0.85). Angiographic myocardial blush (67% vs 70.7%, p = 0.73), in-hospital ejection fraction (47.4 +/- 9.9% vs 45.3 +/- 7.3%, p = 0.29), and combined end point of death, heart failure, or reinfarction at 6 months (14.3% vs 15.7%, p = 0.81) were consistently achieved in a similar proportion in the 2 groups. In conclusion, the use of filter-based distal protection is safe and effectively retrieves debris; however, such use does not translate into an improvement of myocardial reperfusion, left ventricular performance, or clinical outcomes. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 363
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]   The use of a distal occlusion balloon protection device in acute coronary syndrome [J].
Li, SSL ;
Lam, CW ;
So, YC ;
Wong, CH ;
Yiu, SF ;
Ho, D ;
Chan, KW ;
Chan, KT .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 92 (2-3) :281-284
[12]   Mechanical prevention of distal embolization during primary angioplasty - Safety, feasibility, and impact on myocardial reperfusion [J].
Limbruno, U ;
Micheli, A ;
De Carlo, M ;
Amoroso, G ;
Rossini, R ;
Palagi, C ;
Di Bello, V ;
Petronio, AS ;
Fontanini, G ;
Mariani, M .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (02) :171-176
[13]   Distal protection improved reperfusion and reduced left ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute myocardial infarction who had angioscopically defined ruptured plaque [J].
Mizote, I ;
Ueda, Y ;
Ohtani, T ;
Shimizu, M ;
Takeda, Y ;
Oka, T ;
Tsujimoto, M ;
Hirayama, A ;
Hori, M ;
Kodama, K .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (07) :1001-1007
[14]   Intracoronary thrombectomy improves myocardial reperfusion in patients undergoing direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction [J].
Napodano, M ;
Pasquetto, G ;
Saccà, S ;
Cernetti, C ;
Scarabeo, V ;
Pascotto, P ;
Reimers, B .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 42 (08) :1395-1402
[15]   Detection of embolic particles with the Doppler guide wire during coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction - Efficacy of distal protection device [J].
Okamura, A ;
Ito, H ;
Iwakura, K ;
Kawano, S ;
Inoue, K ;
Maekawa, Y ;
Ogihara, T ;
Fujii, K .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (02) :212-215
[16]   Distal protection in native coronary arteries during primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction:: Single-center experience [J].
Orrego, PS ;
Delgado, A ;
Piccalò, G ;
Salvadè, P ;
Bonacina, E ;
Klugmann, S .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2003, 60 (02) :152-158
[17]   Morphometric analysis of particulate debris extracted by four different embolic protection devices from coronary arteries, aortocoronary saphenous vein conduits, and carotid arteries [J].
Quan, VH ;
Huynh, R ;
Seifert, PA ;
Kuchela, A ;
Chen, WH ;
Sütsch, G ;
Eisenhauer, AC ;
Rogers, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 95 (12) :1415-1419
[18]  
Salloum Joseph, 2005, J Invasive Cardiol, V17, P575
[19]   Relation between ST-segment changes and myocardial perfusion evaluated by myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with direct angioplasty [J].
Santoro, GM ;
Valenti, R ;
Buonamici, P ;
Bolognese, L ;
Cerisano, G ;
Moschi, G ;
Trapani, M ;
Antoniucci, D ;
Fazzini, PF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 82 (08) :932-937
[20]   Distal microcirculatory protection during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Stone, GW ;
Webb, J ;
Cox, DA ;
Brodie, BR ;
Qureshi, M ;
Kalynych, A ;
Turco, M ;
Schultheiss, HP ;
Dulas, D ;
Rutherford, BD ;
Antoniucci, D ;
Krucoff, MW ;
Gibbons, RJ ;
Jones, D ;
Lansky, AJ ;
Mehran, R .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (09) :1063-1072