Imaging hypoxia to improve radiotherapy outcome

被引:544
作者
Horsman, Michael R. [1 ]
Mortensen, Lise Sakso [1 ]
Petersen, Jorgen B. [2 ]
Busk, Morten [1 ]
Overgaard, Jens [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Expt Clin Oncol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; TUMOR-CONTROL PROBABILITY; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; NECK-CANCER; RADIATION-THERAPY; BLOOD-FLOW; F-18-FLUOROMISONIDAZOLE PET; F-18; FLUOROMISONIDAZOLE; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.171
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Reduced oxygen levels (hypoxia) is one of the most important factors influencing clinical outcome after radiotherapy. This is primarily because hypoxic cells are resistant to radiation treatment; hence, the greater the number of clonogenic cancer stem cells that exist under hypoxia, the lower the local tumour control. Reduced local control will influence overall survival, as may the hypoxic conditions by increasing malignant progression; however, to fight hypoxia, we should first be able to see it. We need noninvasive approaches that can accurately and reliably image hypoxia in tumours, especially using techniques that are routinely available in the clinic, such as PET, MRI and CT. All these imaging methods are already under clinical evaluation in this context. Such data should allow us to identify those patients on an individual basis who have hypoxic tumours and, thus, at the very least should receive some form of hypoxic modifier in conjunction with radiotherapy. Alternatively, the radiation dose could be either increased to the whole tumour or, if the imaging is accurate enough, only to the hypoxic subvolumes. The aim of this Review is to critically assess the potential use of imaging to help improve clinical outcome to radiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:674 / 687
页数:14
相关论文
共 125 条
[1]
Abolmaali N, 2011, NUKLEARMED-NUCL MED, V50, P22, DOI 10.3413/nukmed-00328-10-07
[2]
ELECTRON-AFFINIC SENSITIZATION .I. A STRUCTURAL BASIS FOR CHEMICAL RADIOSENSITIZERS IN BACTERIA [J].
ADAMS, GE ;
COOKE, MS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY AND RELATED STUDIES IN PHYSICS CHEMISTRY AND MEDICINE, 1969, 15 (05) :457-&
[3]
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Cervical Cancers: Temporal Percentile Screening of Contrast Enhancement Identifies Parameters for Prediction of Chemoradioresistance [J].
Andersen, Erlend K. F. ;
Hole, Knut Hakon ;
Lund, Kjersti V. ;
Sundfor, Kolbein ;
Kristensen, Gunnar B. ;
Lyng, Heidi ;
Malinen, Eirik .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (03) :E485-E492
[4]
Radiosynthesis of three [11C]ureido-substituted benzenesulfonamides as PET probes for carbonic anhydrase IX in tumors [J].
Asakawa, Chiharu ;
Ogawa, Masanao ;
Kumata, Katsushi ;
Fujinaga, Masayuki ;
Yamasaki, Tomoteru ;
Xie, Lin ;
Yui, Joji ;
Kawamura, Kazunori ;
Fukumura, Toshimitsu ;
Zhang, Ming-Rong .
BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2011, 21 (23) :7017-7020
[5]
In vivo evaluation of [18F]fluoroetanidazole as a new marker for imaging tumour hypoxia with positron emission tomography [J].
Barthel, H ;
Wilson, H ;
Collingridge, DR ;
Brown, G ;
Osman, S ;
Luthra, SK ;
Brady, F ;
Workman, P ;
Price, PM ;
Aboagye, EO .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 90 (11) :2232-2242
[6]
Exploring the role of cancer stem cells in radioresistance [J].
Baumann, Michael ;
Krause, Mechthild ;
Hill, Richard .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2008, 8 (07) :545-554
[7]
ACUTE VERSUS CHRONIC HYPOXIA: WHY A SIMPLIFIED CLASSIFICATION IS SIMPLY NOT ENOUGH [J].
Bayer, Christine ;
Shi, Kuangyu ;
Astner, Sabrina T. ;
Maftei, Constantin-Alin ;
Vaupel, Peter .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (04) :965-968
[8]
Begg AC, 2001, ACTA ONCOL, V40, P924
[9]
Theragnostic imaging for radiation oncology: dose-painting by numbers [J].
Bentzen, SM .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (02) :112-117
[10]
Molecular Imaging-Based Dose Painting: A Novel Paradigm for Radiation Therapy Prescription [J].
Bentzen, Soren M. ;
Gregoire, Vincent .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2011, 21 (02) :101-110