Defibrillation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation first for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests found by paramedics to be in ventricular fibrillation? A randomised control trial

被引:95
作者
Baker, Paul W. [1 ]
Conway, Jane [1 ]
Cotton, Chris [1 ]
Ashby, Dale T. [2 ]
Smyth, James [3 ]
Woodman, Richard J. [4 ]
Grantham, Hugh [1 ]
机构
[1] S Australian Ambulance Serv, Eastwood, SA 5063, Australia
[2] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[3] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
[4] Flinders Med Ctr, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
关键词
Advanced life support (ALS); Ambulance; Basic life support (BLS); Cardiac arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); Defibrillation; Paramedic; Ventricular fibrillation;
D O I
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.07.017
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Aim: To determine whether in patients with an ambulance response time of >5 min who were in VF cardiac arrest, 3 min of CPR before the first defibrillation was more effective than immediate defibrillation in improving survival to hospital discharge. Methods: This randomised control trial was run by the South Australian Ambulance Service between 1 July, 2005, and 31 July, 2007. Patients in VF arrest were eligible for randomisation. Exclusion criteria were: (i) <18 years of age, (ii) traumatic arrest, (iii) paramedic witnessed arrest, (iv) advanced life support performed before arrival of paramedics and (v) not for resuscitation order or similar directive. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge with secondary outcomes being neurological status at discharge, the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and the time from first defibrillation to ROSC. Results: For all response times, no differences were observed between the immediate defibrillation group and the CPR first group in survival to hospital discharge (17.1% [18/105] vs. 10.3% [10/97]; P=0.16), the rate of ROSC (53.3% [56/105] vs. 50.5% [49/97]; P=0.69) or the time from the first defibrillation to ROSC (12:37 vs. 11:19; P=0.49). There were also no differences between the immediate defibrillation group and the CPR first group, for response times of <= or > 5 min: survival to hospital discharge (50.0% [7/14] vs. 25.0% [4/16]; P=0.16 or 12.1% [11/91] vs.7.4% [6/81]; P=0.31, respectively) and the rate of ROSC (71.4% [10/14] vs. 75.0% [12/16]; P=0.83 or 50.5% [46/91] vs. 45.7% [37/81]; P=0.54, respectively). No differences were observed in the neurological status of those surviving to hospital discharge. Conclusion: For patient in out-of-hospital VF cardiac arrest we found no evidence to support the use of 3 min of CPR before the first defibrillation over the accepted practice of immediate defibrillation. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 431
页数:8
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Australian Resuscitation Council, 2006, Emerg Med Australas, V18, P337
[2]   Influence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to defibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation [J].
Cobb, LA ;
Fahrenbruch, CE ;
Walsh, TR ;
Copass, MK ;
Olsufka, M ;
Breskin, M ;
Hallstrom, AP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (13) :1182-1188
[3]   Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers [J].
Doig, GS ;
Simpson, F .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 20 (02) :187-191
[4]  
Jacobs Ian G, 2005, Emerg Med Australas, V17, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00694.x
[5]  
Wald A, 2004, SEQUENTIAL ANAL
[6]   Resuscitation after cardiac arrest - A 3-phase time-sensitive model [J].
Weisfeldt, ML ;
Becker, LB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (23) :3035-3038
[7]   Delaying defibrillation to give basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation to patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation - A randomized trial [J].
Wik, L ;
Hansen, TB ;
Fylling, F ;
Steen, T ;
Vaagenes, P ;
Auestad, BH ;
Steen, PA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (11) :1389-1395