Altered response evaluation - Monitoring of late responses after administration of D-amphetamine

被引:12
作者
de Bruijn, ERA
Hulstijn, W
Verkes, RJ
Ruigt, GSF
Sabbe, BGC
机构
[1] Nijmegen Inst Cognit & Informat, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Antwerp, CAPRI, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Unit Clin Psychopharmacol & Neuropsychiat, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Clin Pharmacol Dept Organon, Oss, Netherlands
关键词
Ne; ERN; P2a; P3; amphetamine; action monitoring; flankers task;
D O I
10.1027/0269-8803.19.4.311
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recently, D-amphetamine was shown to increase the error negativity, the so-called "response Ne/ERN," after incorrect choices of hand. We investigated whether this stimulation of action monitoring would also be present in the monitoring of late responses, reflected in the "late Ne/ERN." Twelve healthy volunteers performed a speeded choice-reaction task on two separate occasions on which either D-amphetamine or a placebo was administered. The results showed a clear late Ne/ERN following too late (TL) responses, but the amplitude of this late Ne/ERN was not affected by treatment condition. An error positivity (Pe) was present after the late Ne/ERN in the placebo condition, but not in the amphetamine condition. Also, P2a amplitudes following TL feedback were larger after administration of amphetamine compared to placebo. Questionnaires filled in by participants showed that they overrated their own speed and accuracy after administration of amphetamine. Overall, this suggests that the stimulating aspects of amphetamine lead to changes in affective and motivational evaluation of errors and performance in general. Therefore, along with the established cognitive contributions, the current results provide evidence for an important role of affective processes in action monitoring and the effects they have on accompanying ERP components.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 318
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]   A NEW METHOD FOR OFF-LINE REMOVAL OF OCULAR ARTIFACT [J].
GRATTON, G ;
COLES, MGH ;
DONCHIN, E .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 55 (04) :468-484
[12]  
Holroyd CB, 2002, PSYCHOL REV, V109, P679, DOI [10.1037//0033-295X.109.4.679, 10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.679]
[13]  
JOHNSON TM, 1997, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V34, P48
[14]   Electrophysiological responses to errors and feedback in the process of action regulation [J].
Luu, P ;
Tucker, DM ;
Derryberry, D ;
Reed, M ;
Poulsen, C .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (01) :47-53
[15]   Medial frontal cortex in action monitoring [J].
Luu, P ;
Flaisch, T ;
Tucker, DM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 20 (01) :464-469
[16]  
Nieuwenhuis S, 2001, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V38, P752, DOI 10.1017/S0048577201001111
[17]   Error negativity and response control [J].
Pailing, PE ;
Segalowitz, SJ ;
Dywan, J ;
Davies, PL .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (02) :198-206
[18]   An ERP index of task relevance evaluation of visual stimuli [J].
Potts, GF .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2004, 56 (01) :5-13
[19]   Impact of instructed relevance on the visual ERP [J].
Potts, GF ;
Patel, SH ;
Azzam, PN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 52 (02) :197-209
[20]   The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control [J].
Ridderinkhof, KR ;
Ullsperger, M ;
Crone, EA ;
Nieuwenhuis, S .
SCIENCE, 2004, 306 (5695) :443-447