Combined low-volume polyethylene glycol solution plus stimulant laxatives versus standard-volume polyethylene glycol solution: A prospective, randomized study of colon cleansing before colonoscopy
被引:43
作者:
Hookey, LC
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Queens Univ, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON, CanadaQueens Univ, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON, Canada
Hookey, LC
[1
]
Depew, WT
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Queens Univ, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON, CanadaQueens Univ, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON, Canada
Depew, WT
[1
]
Vanner, SJ
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Queens Univ, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON, CanadaQueens Univ, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON, Canada
Vanner, SJ
[1
]
机构:
[1] Queens Univ, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON, Canada
来源:
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
|
2006年
/
20卷
/
02期
关键词:
colonoscopy;
preparation;
tolerance;
volume;
D O I:
10.1155/2006/621367
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of polyethylene glycol solutions (PEG) for colon cleansing is often limited by the inability of patients to drink adequate portions of the 4 L Solution. The aim of the present study was to determine whether a reduced volume of PEG combined With stimulant laxatives would be better tolerated and as or more effective than the standard dose. METHODS: Patients Undergoing outpatient colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive either low-volume PEG plus sennosides (120 mg Oral sennosides syrup followed by 2 L PEG) or the standard volume preparation (4 L PEG). The subjects rated the tolerability of the preparations and their symptoms. Colonoscopists were blind to the colonic cleansing preparation and graded the cleansing efficacy using a validated tool (the Ottawa scale). RESULTS: The low-volume PEG plus sennosides preparation was significantly better tolerated than the standard large volume PEG ( P < 0.001) but Was less efficacious (P=0.03). Thirty-eight per cent of patients in the large volume PEG group were unable to finish the preparation, compared with only 6% in the reduced volume group. There were no adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: Although the low-volume! PEG plus sennosides preparation was better tolerated, it was not as effective as standard large-volume PEG. However, in view Of the significant difference in tolerance, further research investigating possible improvements in the reduced-volume regimen seems warranted.
机构:
Hop Hotel Dieu, Div Gastroenterol, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON K7L 5G2, CanadaHop Hotel Dieu, Div Gastroenterol, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON K7L 5G2, Canada
Hookey, LC
;
Depew, WT
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Hop Hotel Dieu, Div Gastroenterol, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON K7L 5G2, CanadaHop Hotel Dieu, Div Gastroenterol, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON K7L 5G2, Canada
Depew, WT
;
Vanner, S
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Hop Hotel Dieu, Div Gastroenterol, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON K7L 5G2, CanadaHop Hotel Dieu, Div Gastroenterol, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON K7L 5G2, Canada
机构:
Hop Hotel Dieu, Div Gastroenterol, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON K7L 5G2, CanadaHop Hotel Dieu, Div Gastroenterol, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON K7L 5G2, Canada
Hookey, LC
;
Depew, WT
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Hop Hotel Dieu, Div Gastroenterol, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON K7L 5G2, CanadaHop Hotel Dieu, Div Gastroenterol, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON K7L 5G2, Canada
Depew, WT
;
Vanner, S
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Hop Hotel Dieu, Div Gastroenterol, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON K7L 5G2, CanadaHop Hotel Dieu, Div Gastroenterol, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON K7L 5G2, Canada