Combined low-volume polyethylene glycol solution plus stimulant laxatives versus standard-volume polyethylene glycol solution: A prospective, randomized study of colon cleansing before colonoscopy

被引:43
作者
Hookey, LC [1 ]
Depew, WT [1 ]
Vanner, SJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2006年 / 20卷 / 02期
关键词
colonoscopy; preparation; tolerance; volume;
D O I
10.1155/2006/621367
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of polyethylene glycol solutions (PEG) for colon cleansing is often limited by the inability of patients to drink adequate portions of the 4 L Solution. The aim of the present study was to determine whether a reduced volume of PEG combined With stimulant laxatives would be better tolerated and as or more effective than the standard dose. METHODS: Patients Undergoing outpatient colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive either low-volume PEG plus sennosides (120 mg Oral sennosides syrup followed by 2 L PEG) or the standard volume preparation (4 L PEG). The subjects rated the tolerability of the preparations and their symptoms. Colonoscopists were blind to the colonic cleansing preparation and graded the cleansing efficacy using a validated tool (the Ottawa scale). RESULTS: The low-volume PEG plus sennosides preparation was significantly better tolerated than the standard large volume PEG ( P < 0.001) but Was less efficacious (P=0.03). Thirty-eight per cent of patients in the large volume PEG group were unable to finish the preparation, compared with only 6% in the reduced volume group. There were no adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: Although the low-volume! PEG plus sennosides preparation was better tolerated, it was not as effective as standard large-volume PEG. However, in view Of the significant difference in tolerance, further research investigating possible improvements in the reduced-volume regimen seems warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 105
页数:5
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]   Comparison of reduced volume Versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing [J].
DiPalma, JA ;
Wolff, BG ;
Meagher, A ;
Cleveland, MV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (10) :2187-2191
[12]   A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation [J].
El Sayed, AMA ;
Kanafani, ZA ;
Mourad, FH ;
Soweid, AM ;
Barada, KA ;
Adorian, CS ;
Nasreddine, WA ;
Sharara, AI .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (01) :36-40
[13]   Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy [J].
Frommer, D .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (01) :100-104
[14]   EVALUATION OF RAPID COLONOSCOPY PREPARATION USING A NEW GUT LAVAGE SOLUTION [J].
GOLDMAN, J ;
REICHELDERFER, M .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1982, 28 (01) :9-11
[15]   COLONOSCOPIC BOWEL PREPARATIONS - WHICH ONE - A BLINDED, PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
GOLUB, RW ;
KERNER, BA ;
WISE, WE ;
MEESIG, DM ;
HARTMANN, RF ;
KHANDUJA, KS ;
AGUILAR, PS .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1995, 38 (06) :594-599
[16]  
Habr-Gama A, 1999, Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo, V54, P187, DOI 10.1590/S0041-87811999000600004
[17]   COMPARISON OF 3 COLON CLEANSING METHODS - EVALUATION OF A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL WITH 300 AMBULATORY PATIENTS [J].
HANGARTNER, PJ ;
MUNCH, R ;
MEIER, J ;
AMMANN, R ;
BUHLER, H .
ENDOSCOPY, 1989, 21 (06) :272-275
[18]   A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy [J].
Harewood, GC ;
Wiersema, MJ ;
Melton, LJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (12) :3186-3194
[19]   SINGLE-DAY, DIVIDED-DOSE ORAL SODIUM-PHOSPHATE LAXATIVE VERSUS INTESTINAL LAVAGE AS PREPARATION FOR COLONOSCOPY - EFFICACY AND PATIENT TOLERANCE [J].
HENDERSON, JM ;
BARNETT, JL ;
TURGEON, DK ;
ELTA, GH ;
BEHLER, EM ;
CRAUSE, I ;
NOSTRANT, TT .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 42 (03) :238-243
[20]   The safety profile of oral sodium phosphate for colonic cleansing before colonoscopy in adults [J].
Hookey, LC ;
Depew, WT ;
Vanner, S .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (06) :895-902