Radiographic characteristics on conventional radiographs after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: Comparative study between radiotranslucent and radiopaque cages

被引:46
作者
Diedrich, O [1 ]
Perlick, L [1 ]
Schmitt, O [1 ]
Kraft, CN [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Dept Orthopaed Surg, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS | 2001年 / 14卷 / 06期
关键词
prosthesis and implants; spine; spinal fusion; lumbar vertebrae; spondylolisthesis; radiographic evaluation;
D O I
10.1097/00002517-200112000-00012
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The problem of determining solidity of a fused spinal segment still remains. Our purpose is to evaluate radiographic findings after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with cages and estimate their relative value in judging fusion status. Radiographic follow-up was per-formed in patients after PLIF with cages of either radiotranslucent or radiopaque material. Conventional radiographs were obtained 6 weeks. 3 and 6 months, and then yearly after surgery for spinal instability for 64 patients. We differentiated between uncertain (increased density within the cage. increase of sclerotic endplates. and posterolateral fusion) and definite (trabecular continuous bone bridging within the implant and periimplant new bone formation with bridging of the intervertebral space) fusion signs. A fusion rate of 51.5% after 12 months, 61.4% after 24 months, 66.7% after 36 months, and 77.8% after 48 months postoperatively was found. We found only a slight, nonsignificant correlation between radiographic fusion and patient-assessed clinical outcome, There is evidence that radiographic fusion criteria occur in a specific chronologic order. The interpretation of fusion status is notably impaired by the use of radiopaque cages. Criteria to standardize the interpretation and evaluation of radiographic findings after PLIF are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 532
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]
BAGBY GW, 1988, ORTHOPEDICS, V11, P931
[2]
CAN LUMBAR SPINE RADIOGRAPHS ACCURATELY DETERMINE FUSION IN POSTOPERATIVE-PATIENTS - CORRELATION OF ROUTINE RADIOGRAPHS WITH A 2ND SURGICAL LOOK AT LUMBAR FUSIONS [J].
BLUMENTHAL, SL ;
GILL, K .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (09) :1186-1189
[3]
INTERBODY LUMBAR FUSION USING A CARBON-FIBER CAGE IMPLANT VERSUS ALLOGRAFT BONE - AN INVESTIGATIONAL STUDY IN THE SPANISH GOAT [J].
BRANTIGAN, JW ;
MCAFEE, PC ;
CUNNINGHAM, BW ;
WANG, H ;
ORBEGOSO, CM .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (13) :1436-1444
[4]
PSEUDOARTHROSIS RATE AFTER ALLOGRAFT POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITH PEDICLE SCREW AND PLATE FIXATION [J].
BRANTIGAN, JW .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (11) :1271-1279
[5]
A CARBON-FIBER IMPLANT TO AID INTERBODY LUMBAR FUSION - 2-YEAR CLINICAL-RESULTS IN THE 1ST 26 PATIENTS [J].
BRANTIGAN, JW ;
STEFFEE, AD .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (14) :2106-2117
[6]
A CARBON-FIBER IMPLANT TO AID INTERBODY LUMBAR FUSION - MECHANICAL TESTING [J].
BRANTIGAN, JW ;
STEFFEE, AD ;
GEIGER, JM .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (06) :S277-S282
[7]
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion - A biomechanical comparison, including a new threaded cage [J].
Brodke, DS ;
Dick, JC ;
Kunz, DN ;
McCabe, R ;
Zdeblick, TA .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (01) :26-31
[8]
CORRELATION OF RADIOLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF LUMBAR SPINE FUSIONS WITH SURGICAL EXPLORATION [J].
BRODSKY, AE ;
KOVALSKY, ES ;
KHALIL, MA .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (06) :S261-S265
[9]
Imaging pitfalls of interbody spinal implants [J].
Cizek, GR ;
Boyd, LM .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (20) :2633-2636
[10]
CLOWARD RB, 1981, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P74