Anterior chamber depth measurement: A-scan versus optical methods

被引:60
作者
Koranyi, G
Lydahl, E
Norrby, S
Taube, M
机构
[1] St Eriks Eye Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, SE-11282 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Pharmacia, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01039-2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate methods of measuring anterior chamber depth (ACD) before and after cataract surgery. Setting. St. Erik's Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Methods: A-scan (BVI Axis) and Scheimpflug imaging (Nidek EAS-1000) were used to measure ACD preoperatively and 6 and 18 weeks after phacoemulsification with implantation of a poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) intraocular lens (IOL) in 23 patients. Because of a large systematic difference between the 2 methods, measurement with Orbscan (Orbtek) and optical pachymetry (Haag-Streit) were included when measurements were repeated 36 weeks postoperatively. A t test for paired observations was used for statistical analysis. Results: Preoperatively, the mean A-scan measurements were significantly shorter than the Scheimpflug values: 3.05 mm +/- 0.36 (SD) and 3.37 +/- 0.35 mm, respectively (P<.001). At 6 weeks, the difference was more pronounced: 3.73 ± 0.26 mm and 4.65 ± 0.33 mm, respectively (P<.001). At 36 weeks, the A-scan and Scheimpflug values remained unchanged. The results of the Scheimpflug measurements were confirmed with optical pachymetry and Orbscan analysis. Conclusions. There was good agreement between results obtained with 3 methods based on optical principles. Considering the basic and simple measurement principle of these instruments, they appear to provide the correct result. The A-scar equipment used in this study is unsuitable for determination of ACD in eyes with PMMA 1OLs. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28:243-247 (C) 2002 ASCRS and ESCRS.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 247
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF A-SCAN DEVICE ACCURACY [J].
GIERS, U ;
EPPLE, C .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1990, 16 (02) :235-242
[2]  
HOFFER KJ, 1994, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V20, P677
[4]   A 3-PART SYSTEM FOR REFINING INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER CALCULATIONS [J].
HOLLADAY, JT ;
PRAGER, TC ;
CHANDLER, TY ;
MUSGROVE, KH ;
LEWIS, JW ;
RUIZ, RS .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1988, 14 (01) :17-24
[5]   Complications of foldable intraocular lenses requiring explantation or secondary intervention - 1998 survey [J].
Mamalis, N .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 26 (05) :766-772
[6]   Determining the imaging quality of intraocular lenses [J].
Norrby, NES ;
Grossman, LW ;
Geraghty, EP ;
Kreiner, CF ;
Mihori, M ;
Patel, AS ;
Portney, V ;
Silberman, DM .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 24 (05) :703-714
[7]   Prediction of intraocular lens power using the lens haptic plane concept [J].
Norrby, NES ;
Koranyi, G .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 23 (02) :254-259
[8]  
Norrby NES, 1995, EUR J IMPLANT REFRAC, V7, P202
[9]   Multicenter biometry study of 1 pair of eyes [J].
Norrby, S .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 27 (10) :1656-1661
[10]   SOURCES OF ERROR IN INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER CALCULATION [J].
OLSEN, T .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1992, 18 (02) :125-129