Pancreatic CT imaging: Effects of different injection rates and doses of contrast material

被引:66
作者
Kim, T [1 ]
Murakami, T [1 ]
Takahashi, S [1 ]
Okada, A [1 ]
Hori, M [1 ]
Narumi, Y [1 ]
Nakamura, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
computed tomography (CT); contrast enhancement; pancreas; CT; neoplasms;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl06219
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To assess the effects of the intravenous injection rate and dose of contrast material on pancreatic computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 126 patients were divided at random into four groups with different injection rates and doses. Groups 1 and 2 underwent injection of 2 mt per kilogram of body weight of 300 mg of iodine per milliliter of contrast material, and groups 3 and 4 underwent injection of 1.5 mL/kg. The injection rate was 5 mL/sec for groups 1 and 3 and 3 mL/sec for groups 2 and 4. Single-level serial CT scanning was performed at the level of the pancreatic head, and the pancreatic enhancement value was calculated. RESULTS: The maximum pancreatic enhancement value was 99 HU +/- 18 (mean +/- SD) for group 1, 90 HU +/- 18 for group 2, 86 HU +/- 15 for group 3, and 74 HU +/- 13 for group 4. There were significant differences in the maximum pancreatic enhancement value between groups 1 and 2 (P =.045), between groups 3 and 4 (P =.001), between groups 1 and 3 (P =.016), and between groups 2 and 4 (P =.001). CONCLUSION: Both a higher dose and a faster injection rate increased the maximum pancreatic enhancement value.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 225
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Hepatocellular carcinoma: Evaluation with biphasic, contrast-enhanced, helical CT [J].
Baron, RL ;
Oliver, JH ;
Dodd, GD ;
Nalesnik, M ;
Holbert, BL ;
Carr, B .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (02) :505-511
[2]   UNDERSTANDING AND OPTIMIZING USE OF CONTRAST MATERIAL FOR CT OF THE LIVER [J].
BARON, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (02) :323-331
[3]   POTENTIALLY RESECTABLE PANCREATIC ADENOCARCINOMA - SPIRAL CT ASSESSMENT WITH SURGICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION [J].
BLUEMKE, DA ;
CAMERON, JL ;
HRUBAN, RH ;
PITT, HA ;
SIEGELMAN, SS ;
SOYER, P ;
FISHMAN, EK .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (02) :381-385
[4]   A comparison of two injection protocols using helical and dynamic acquisitions in CT examinations of the pancreas [J].
Bonaldi, VM ;
Bret, PM ;
Atri, M ;
Garcia, P ;
Reinhold, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 167 (01) :49-55
[5]   HEPATIC CT ENHANCEMENT .1. ALTERATIONS IN THE VOLUME OF CONTRAST MATERIAL WITHIN THE SAME PATIENTS [J].
CHAMBERS, TP ;
BARON, RL ;
LUSH, RM .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (02) :513-517
[6]   HEPATIC HELICAL CT - CONTRAST MATERIAL INJECTION PROTOCOL [J].
FOLEY, WD ;
HOFFMANN, RG ;
QUIROZ, FA ;
KAHN, CE ;
PERRET, RS .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 192 (02) :367-371
[7]   Effect of rate of contrast medium injection on hepatic enhancement at CT [J].
Garcia, PA ;
Bonaldi, VM ;
Bret, PM ;
Liang, LJ ;
Reinhold, C ;
Atri, M .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (01) :185-189
[8]   Arterial versus portal venous helical CT for revealing pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Conspicuity of tumor and critical vascular anatomy [J].
Graf, O ;
Boland, GW ;
Warshaw, AL ;
FernandezdelCastillo, C ;
Hahn, PF ;
Mueller, PR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (01) :119-123
[9]   DYNAMIC INCREMENTAL CT - EFFECT OF VOLUME AND CONCENTRATION OF CONTRAST MATERIAL AND PATIENT WEIGHT ON HEPATIC ENHANCEMENT [J].
HEIKEN, JP ;
BRINK, JA ;
MCCLENNAN, BL ;
SAGEL, SS ;
CROWE, TM ;
GAINES, MV .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (02) :353-357
[10]   QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION OF PANCREATIC ENHANCEMENT DURING DUAL-PHASE HELICAL CT [J].
HOLLETT, MD ;
JORGENSEN, MJ ;
JEFFREY, RB .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (02) :359-361