Assessment of cardiac output in children: A comparison between the pressure recording analytical method and Doppler echocardiogyaphy

Objective: To assess cardiac output in pediatric patients with the pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) and the Doppler echocardiography method. PRAM derives cardiac output from beat-by-beat analysis of the arterial pressure profile (systolic and diastolic phase) in the time domain. Design: A prospective observational study. Setting. Pediatric intensive care, unit at a tertiary care children's hospital.. Patients: Forty-eight patients between the ages of 1 month and 18 yrs. Interventions: Femoral or radial artery catheterization and mechanical ventilation. Measurements and Main Results. Cardiac output was simultaneously estimated by Doppler echocardiography and PRAM. Cardiac output values obtained by Doppler echocardiography (2.7 +/- 1.6 L/min, range 0.92-8.20) were significantly correlated with those estimated by PRAM (2.6 +/- 1.7 L/min, range 0.89-7.48; r(2) = .99, p < .01). The mean difference between the two estimates was 0.12 +/- 0.27 L.min(-1) (95% confidence interval, -0.54 to 0.77 L.min(-1)). Conclusions: In the range of ages evaluated, PRAM provides reliable estimates of cardiac output when compared with noninvasive techniques.