A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations

被引:556
作者
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique [1 ]
Alonso, Sergio
Chiclana, Francisco
Herrera, Francisco
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Comp Sci & Artificial Intelligence, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[2] De Montfort Univ, Sch Comp, Ctr Computat Intelligence, Leicester LE1 9BH, Leics, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
aggregation; consensus; fuzzy preference relations; group decision making (GDM);
D O I
10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.889952
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Two processes are necessary to solve group decision making problems: A consensus process and a selection process. The consensus reaching process is necessary to obtain a final solution with a certain level of agreement between the experts; and the selection process is necessary to obtain such a final solution. In a previous paper, we present a selection process to deal with group decision making problems with incomplete fuzzy preference relations, which uses consistency measures to estimate the incomplete fuzzy preference relations. In this paper we present a consensus model. The main novelty of this consensus model is that of being guided by both consensus and consistency measures. Also, the consensus reaching process is guided automatically, without moderator, through both consensus and consistency criteria. To do that, a feedback mechanism is developed to generate advice on how experts should change or complete their preferences in order to reach a solution with high consensus and consistency degrees. In each consensus round, experts are given information on how to change their preferences, and to estimate missing values if their corresponding preference relation is incomplete. Additionally, a consensus and consistency based induced ordered weighted averaging operator to aggregate the experts' preferences is introduced, which can be used in consensus models as well as in selection processes. The main improvements of this consensus model is that it supports the management of incomplete information and it allows to achieve consistent solutions with a great level of agreement.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 877
页数:15
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]   A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures [J].
Herrera-Viedma, E ;
Herrera, F ;
Chiclana, F .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2002, 32 (03) :394-402
[22]   Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency [J].
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique ;
Chiclana, Francisco ;
Herrera, Francisco ;
Alonso, Sergio .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 2007, 37 (01) :176-189
[23]   GROUP DECISION-MAKING AND CONSENSUS UNDER FUZZY PREFERENCES AND FUZZY MAJORITY [J].
KACPRZYK, J ;
FEDRIZZI, M ;
NURMI, H .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1992, 49 (01) :21-31
[24]   A SOFT MEASURE OF CONSENSUS IN THE SETTING OF PARTIAL (FUZZY) PREFERENCES [J].
KACPRZYK, J ;
FEDRIZZI, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1988, 34 (03) :316-325
[25]   GROUP DECISION-MAKING WITH A FUZZY LINGUISTIC MAJORITY [J].
KACPRZYK, J .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 18 (02) :105-118
[26]  
KACPRZYK J, 1997, CONSENSUS UNDER FUZZ
[27]   Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection [J].
Kahraman, C ;
Ruan, D ;
Dogan, I .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2003, 157 (1-4) :135-153
[28]   An interactive procedure for multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete information: Range-based approach [J].
Kim, SH ;
Choi, SH ;
Kim, JK .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 118 (01) :139-152
[29]   Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information [J].
Kim, SH ;
Ahn, BS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 116 (03) :498-507
[30]  
KUNCHEVA LI, 1991, P IFSA, P141