Partisan and bipartisan signaling in congress

被引:21
作者
Epstein, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jleo/14.2.183
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Gilligan and Krehbiel (1989) analyze bipartisanship in committees through a model in which committee ideal points are exactly symmetric about the floor's ideal point. This article has three objectives: it shows that the Gilligan and Krehbiel equilibrium does not generalize to asymmetric committee members; it proves that a similar equilibrium can be supported when the majority party committee member has gatekeeping power; and it compares this equilibrium to the one-signaler case to show that when partisan differences over policy are small, or when the uncertainty associated with a policy area is large, bipartsianship will be preferred to partisan policy making.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 204
页数:22
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
AUSTENSMITH D, 1993, GAMES EC BEHAV, V4, P133
[2]  
Banks Jeffrey S., 1991, SIGNALING GAMES POLI
[3]   EQUILIBRIUM SELECTION IN SIGNALING GAMES [J].
BANKS, JS ;
SOBEL, J .
ECONOMETRICA, 1987, 55 (03) :647-661
[4]   SIGNALING GAMES AND STABLE EQUILIBRIA [J].
CHO, IK ;
KREPS, DM .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1987, 102 (02) :179-221
[5]   INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT AND LEADERSHIP-STYLE - THE HOUSE FROM CANNON TO RAYBURN [J].
COOPER, J ;
BRADY, DW .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1981, 75 (02) :411-425
[6]  
Cox GaryW., 1993, Legislative Leviathan. Party Government in the House
[7]   STRATEGIC INFORMATION-TRANSMISSION [J].
CRAWFORD, VP ;
SOBEL, J .
ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (06) :1431-1451
[8]   An informational rationale for committee gatekeeping power [J].
Epstein, D .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 1997, 91 (3-4) :271-299
[9]  
EPSTEIN D, 1995, J LAW ECON ORGAN, V11, P227
[10]  
Gibbons RS, 1992, Game Theory for Applied Economists