Mechanically unfolding the small, topologically simple protein L

被引:132
作者
Brockwell, DJ [1 ]
Beddard, GS
Paci, E
West, DK
Olmsted, PD
Smith, DA
Radford, SE
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Biochem & Microbiol, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Inst Mol Biophys, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Sch Chem, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Ctr Chem Dynam, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Leeds, Sch Phys & Astron, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1529/biophysj.105.061465
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
beta-sheet proteins are generally more able to resist mechanical deformation than alpha-helical proteins. Experiments measuring the mechanical resistance of beta-sheet proteins extended by their termini led to the hypothesis that parallel, directly hydrogen-bonded terminal beta-strands provide the greatest mechanical strength. Here we test this hypothesis by measuring the mechanical properties of protein L, a domain with a topology predicted to be mechanically strong, but with no known mechanical function. A pentamer of this small, topologically simple protein is resistant to mechanical deformation over a wide range of extension rates. Molecular dynamics simulations show the energy landscape for protein L is highly restricted for mechanical unfolding and that this protein unfolds by the shearing apart of two structural units in a mechanism similar to that proposed for ubiquitin, which belongs to the same structural class as protein L, but unfolds at a significantly higher force. These data suggest that the mechanism of mechanical unfolding is conserved in proteins within the same fold family and demonstrate that although the topology and presence of a hydrogen-bonded clamp are of central importance in determining mechanical strength, hydrophobic interactions also play an important role in modulating the mechanical resistance of these similar proteins.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 519
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
BELL GI, 1978, SCIENCE, V200, P618, DOI 10.1126/science.347575
[2]   Mechanical unfolding of a titin Ig domain: Structure of transition state revealed by combining atomic force microscopy, protein engineering and molecular dynamics simulations [J].
Best, RB ;
Fowler, SB ;
Herrera, JLT ;
Steward, A ;
Paci, E ;
Clarke, J .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2003, 330 (04) :867-877
[3]   Force mode atomic force microscopy as a tool for protein folding studies [J].
Best, RB ;
Brockwell, DJ ;
Toca-Herrera, JL ;
Blake, AW ;
Smith, DA ;
Radford, SE ;
Clarke, J .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2003, 479 (01) :87-105
[4]   A simple method for probing the mechanical unfolding pathway of proteins in detail [J].
Best, RB ;
Fowler, SB ;
Toca-Herrera, JL ;
Clarke, J .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (19) :12143-12148
[5]   Can non-mechanical proteins withstand force? Stretching barnase by atomic force microscopy and molecular dynamics simulation [J].
Best, RB ;
Li, B ;
Steward, A ;
Daggett, V ;
Clarke, J .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 81 (04) :2344-2356
[6]  
BJORCK L, 1988, J IMMUNOL, V140, P1194
[7]   Pulling geometry defines the mechanical resistance of a β-sheet protein [J].
Brockwell, DJ ;
Paci, E ;
Zinober, RC ;
Beddard, GS ;
Olmsted, PD ;
Smith, DA ;
Perham, RN ;
Radford, SE .
NATURE STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2003, 10 (09) :731-737
[8]   The effect of core destabilization on the mechanical resistance of I27 [J].
Brockwell, DJ ;
Beddard, GS ;
Clarkson, J ;
Zinober, RC ;
Blake, AW ;
Trinick, J ;
Olmsted, PD ;
Smith, DA ;
Radford, SE .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 83 (01) :458-472
[9]  
Bustanji Y, 2002, ANGEW CHEM INT EDIT, V41, P1546, DOI 10.1002/1521-3773(20020503)41:9<1546::AID-ANIE1546>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-U