Evaluation of a flow cytometry method for CD4 T cell enumeration based on volumetric primary CD4 gating using thermoresistant reagents

被引:17
作者
Dieye, Tandakha Ndiaye [1 ,2 ]
Diaw, Papa Alassane [1 ]
Daneau, Geraldine [3 ]
Wade, Djibril [1 ]
Niang, Maguette Sylla [2 ]
Camara, Makhtar [1 ]
Diallo, Abdoul Aziz [1 ]
Kane, Coumba Toure [1 ]
Ndiaye, Halimatou Diop [1 ]
Mbengue, Babacar [2 ]
Dieye, Alioune [2 ]
Kestens, Luc [3 ]
Mboup, Souleymane [1 ]
机构
[1] Le Dantec Univ Teaching Hosp, Immunol Unit, Lab Bacteriol Virol, CHU, Dakar, Senegal
[2] Cheikh Anta DIOP Univ, Dept Pharmaceut & Biol Sci, Serv Immunol, Fac Med Pharm & Odontostomatol, Dakar, Senegal
[3] Inst Trop Med, Immunol Lab, Dept Microbiol, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
CD4; counts; Flow cytometry; Resource-limited; Primary gating; Volumetric; HIV; RESOURCE-LIMITED SETTINGS; HIV-INFECTED PATIENTS; LYMPHOCYTE COUNTS; HIV-1-INFECTED PATIENTS; EASYCD4; ASSAY; ABSOLUTE; SYSTEM; BLOOD; LABORATORIES; COEFFICIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jim.2011.07.012
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Laboratory follow-up of HIV patients in resource-limited settings requires appropriate instruments for CD4 T cell enumeration. In this study, we evaluated the application of a simplified, mobile and robust flow cytometry system, the Apogee Auto 40 analyzer (Auto40) using thermoresistant reagents, for CD4 T cell enumeration. We measured the absolute CD4 counts in fresh whole blood samples from 170 Senegalese subjects, including 129 HIV-positive (HIV+) patients and 41 HIV-negative (HIV-) controls. Based on volumetric primary CD4 gating, cells were stained with commercially available reagents (Easy MoAb CD4;Bio-D, Valenzano, Italy) and analyzed on the Auto40. The results were compared with those from the FACSCount system (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, USA). Repeatability analysis was performed on duplicate testing of 49 samples on both FACSCount and Auto40. The intra-run precision was measured by 10 replicates using 3 clinical blood samples with low, intermediate and high CD4 concentrations. The results from the two instruments were in good agreement. The percent similarity between the results of both instruments was 99% +/- relative standard deviation of 12.7%. The concordance correlation coefficient was 0.99. The absolute bias and limits of agreement (LOA) between the two instruments, calculated by Bland-Altman analysis, were clinically acceptable (bias: +4 cells/mu l; LOA: 111 to + 120 cells/mu l). The clinical agreement between the two instruments at a cutoff of 200 CD4 cells/mu l was 94%. The repeatability of measurements on the Auto40 was also similar to that observed with FACSCount system (bias +0.1 cells/mu l, coefficient of variation 2.5% vs bias -1.1 cells/mu l, coefficient of variation 2.9% respectively). In conclusion, our results indicate that the Auto 40 system, using thermoresistant reagents, is suitable for CD4 T cell enumeration and will be a helpful tool to improve HIV laboratory monitoring in resource-limited settings. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 13
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, PRIOR INT HIV AIDS P
[2]   A reliable and inexpensive EasyCD4 assay for monitoring HIV-infected individuals in resource-limited settings [J].
Balakrishnan, Pachamuthu ;
Solomon, Suniti ;
Mohanakrishnan, Janardhanan ;
Cecelia, Anitha J. ;
Kumarasamy, Nagalingeswaran ;
Murugavel, Kailapuri G. ;
Venkatakrishnan, Bhavani ;
Solomon, Sunil S. ;
Crowe, Suzanne M. ;
Ganesh, Aylur K. ;
Thyagarajan, Sadras P. ;
Flanigan, Timothy ;
Mayer, Kenneth H. .
JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2006, 43 (01) :23-26
[3]   A simplified flow cytometry method of CD4 and CD8 cell counting based on thermoresistant reagents: Implications for large scale monitoring of HIV-infected patients in resource-limited settings [J].
Barbesti, S ;
Soldini, L ;
Carcelain, G ;
Guignet, A ;
Colizzi, V ;
Mantelli, B ;
Corvaglia, A ;
Tran-Minh, T ;
Dorigatti, F ;
Autran, B ;
Lazzarin, A ;
Beretta, A .
CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY, 2005, 68B (01) :43-51
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]  
Brando B, 2000, CYTOMETRY, V42, P327, DOI 10.1002/1097-0320(20001215)42:6<327::AID-CYTO1000>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-F
[7]   Effective evaluation of novel low-cost CD4 monitoring assays [J].
Cecelia, Anitha Jebaraj ;
Balakrishnan, Pachamuthu ;
Mohanakrishnan ;
Venkatakrishnan, Bhavani ;
Solomon, Suniti ;
Kumarasamy, Nagalingeswaran .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 2006, 316 (1-2) :158-162
[8]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[9]   STANDARDIZATION OF ABSOLUTE CD4(+) LYMPHOCYTE COUNTS ACROSS LABORATORIES - AN EVALUATION OF THE ORTHO CYTORONABSOLUTE FLOW-CYTOMETRY SYSTEM ON NORMAL DONORS [J].
CONNELLY, MC ;
KNIGHT, M ;
GIORGI, JV ;
KAGAN, J ;
LANDAY, AL ;
PARKER, JW ;
PAGE, E ;
SPINO, C ;
WILKENING, C ;
MERCOLINO, TJ .
CYTOMETRY, 1995, 22 (03) :200-210
[10]   Absolute CD4 T-Cell counting in resource-poor settings - Direct volumetric measurements versus bead-based clinical flow cytometry instruments [J].
Dieye, TN ;
Vereecken, C ;
Diallo, AA ;
Ondoa, P ;
Diaw, PA ;
Camara, M ;
Karam, F ;
Mboup, S ;
Kestens, L .
JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2005, 39 (01) :32-37