Evaluation of detector dynamic range in the x-ray exposure domain in mammography: A comparison between film-screen and flat panel detector systems

被引:15
作者
Cooper, VN
Oshiro, T
Cagnon, CH
Bassett, LW
McLeod-Stockmann, TM
Bezrukiy, NV
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Radiol Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
dynamic range; flat panel; digital mammography; ACR phantom;
D O I
10.1118/1.1606450
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Digital detectors in mammography have wide dynamic range in addition to the benefit of decoupled acquisition and display. How wide the dynamic range is and how it compares to film-screen systems in the clinical x-ray exposure domain are unclear: In this work, we compare the effective dynamic ranges of film-screen and flat panel mammography systems, along with the dynamic ranges of their component image receptors in the clinical x-ray exposure domain. An ACR mammography phantom was imaged using variable mAs (exposure) values for both systems. The dynamic range of the contrast-limited film-screen system was defined as that ratio of mAs (exposure) values for a 26 kVp Mo/Mo (HVL=0.34 mm A1) beam that yielded passing phantom scores. The same approach was done for the noise-limited digital system. Data from three independent observers delineated a useful phantom background optical density range of 1.27 to 2.63, which corresponded to a dynamic range of 2.3+/-0.53. The digital system had a dynamic range of 9.9+/-1.8, which was wider than the film-screen system (p<0.02). The dynamic range of the film-screen system was limited by the dynamic range of the film. The digital detector, on the other hand, had an estimated dynamic range of 42, which was wider than the-dynamic range of the digital system in its entirety by a factor of 4. The generator/tube combination was the limiting factor in determining the digital system's dynamic range. (C) 2003 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2614 / 2621
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   A lesion detectability simulation method for digital x-ray imaging [J].
Cooper, VN ;
Boone, JM ;
Seibert, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (01) :66-74
[2]   Classification of compressed breast shapes for the design of equalization filters in x-ray mammography [J].
Goodsitt, MM ;
Chan, HP ;
Liu, B ;
Guru, SV ;
Morton, AR ;
Keshavmurthy, S ;
Petrick, N .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (06) :937-948
[3]  
HENDRICK RE, 1999, ACR MAMMOGRAPHY QUAL, P142
[4]   How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography?' [J].
Huda, W ;
Sajewicz, AM ;
Ogden, KM ;
Scalzetti, EM ;
Dance, DR .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (07) :764-772
[5]   Contrast-detail detectability analysis: Comparison of a digital spot mammography system and an analog screen-film mammography system [J].
Liu, H ;
Fajardo, LL ;
Barrett, JR ;
Baxter, RA .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1997, 4 (03) :197-203
[6]   DYNAMIC-RANGE REQUIREMENTS IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
MAIDMENT, ADA ;
FAHRIG, R ;
YAFFE, MJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (06) :1621-1633
[7]   Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system [J].
Muller, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 31 (01) :25-34
[8]   Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: A pictorial essay [J].
Pisano, ED ;
Cole, EB ;
Hemminger, BM ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Aylward, SR ;
Maidment, ADA ;
Johnston, RE ;
Williams, MB ;
Niklason, LT ;
Conant, EF ;
Fajardo, LL ;
Kopans, DB ;
Brown, ME ;
Pizer, SM .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2000, 20 (05) :1479-1491
[9]   A METHOD FOR PRACTICAL EQUALIZATION MAMMOGRAPHY OF THE RADIOGRAPHICALLY DENSE BREAST [J].
SABOL, JM ;
SOUTAR, IC ;
PLEWES, DB .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1995, 15 (05) :1191-1202
[10]   Practical application of a scan-rotate equalization geometry to mammography [J].
Sabol, JM ;
Soutar, IC ;
Plewes, DB .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (12) :1987-1996