Widespread evolutionary conservation of alternatively spliced exons in Caenorhabditis

被引:39
作者
Irimia, Manuel [1 ]
Rukov, Jakob L. [2 ]
Penny, David [3 ]
Garcia-Fernandez, Jordi [1 ]
Vinther, Jeppe [2 ]
Roy, Scott W. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Genet, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Mol Biol, Mol Evolut Grp, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Massey Univ, Allan Wilson Ctr Mol Evolut & Ecol, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[4] Natl Lib Med, Natl Ctr Biotechnol Informat, Natl Inst Hlth, Bethesda, MD 20894 USA
关键词
alternative splicing; Coenorhabditis; cassette exon; evolution; genome;
D O I
10.1093/molbev/msm262
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Alternative splicing (AS) contributes to increased transcriptome and proteome diversity in various eukaryotic lineages. Previous studies showed low levels of conservation of alternatively spliced (cassette) exons within mammals and within dipterans. We report a strikingly different pattern in Caenorhabditis nematodes-more than 92% of cassette exons from Caenorhabditis elegans are conserved in Caenorhabditis briggsae and/or Caenorhabditis remanei. High levels of conservation extend to minor-form exerts (present in a minority of transcripts) and are particularly pronounced for exons showing complex patterns of splicing. The functionality of the vast majority of cassette exons is underscored by various other features. We suggest that differences in conservation between lineages reflect differences in levels of functionality and further suggest that these differences are due to differences in intron length and the strength of consensus boundaries across lineages. Finally, we demonstrate an inverse relationship between AS and gene duplication, suggesting that the latter may be primarily responsible for the emergence of new functional transcripts in nematodes.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 382
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   How did alternative splicing evolve? [J].
Ast, G .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2004, 5 (10) :773-782
[2]   WormBase:: new content and better access [J].
Bieri, Tamberlyn ;
Blasiar, Darin ;
Ozersky, Philip ;
Antoshechkin, Igor ;
Bastiani, Carol ;
Canaran, Payan ;
Chan, Juancarlos ;
Chen, Nansheng ;
Chen, Wen J. ;
Davis, Paul ;
Fiedler, Tristan J. ;
Girard, Lisa ;
Han, Michael ;
Harris, Todd W. ;
Kishore, Ranjana ;
Lee, Raymond ;
McKay, Sheldon ;
Muller, Hans-Michael ;
Nakamura, Cecilia ;
Petcherski, Andrei ;
Rangarajan, Arun ;
Rogers, Anthony ;
Schindelman, Gary ;
Schwarz, Erich M. ;
Spooner, Will ;
Tuli, Mary Ann ;
Van Auken, Kimberly ;
Wang, Daniel ;
Wang, Xiaodong ;
Williams, Gary ;
Durbin, Richard ;
Stein, Lincoln D. ;
Sternberg, Paul W. ;
Spieth, John .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2007, 35 :D506-D510
[3]   A phylogeny of Caenorhabditis reveals frequent loss of introns during nematode evolution [J].
Cho, SC ;
Jin, SW ;
Cohen, A ;
Ellis, RE .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2004, 14 (07) :1207-1220
[4]   Fourfold faster rate of genome rearrangement in nematodes than in Drosophila [J].
Coghlan, A ;
Wolfe, KH .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2002, 12 (06) :857-867
[5]   Investigating the intron recognition mechanism in eukaryotes [J].
Collins, L ;
Penny, D .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2006, 23 (05) :901-910
[6]   The Ensembl automatic gene annotation system [J].
Curwen, V ;
Eyras, E ;
Andrews, TD ;
Clarke, L ;
Mongin, E ;
Searle, SMJ ;
Clamp, M .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2004, 14 (05) :942-950
[7]   Changes in alternative splicing of human and mouse genes are accompanied by faster evolution of constitutive exons [J].
Cusack, BP ;
Wolfe, KH .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2005, 22 (11) :2198-2208
[8]   BioMart and Bioconductor: a powerful link between biological databases and microarray data analysis [J].
Durinck, S ;
Moreau, Y ;
Kasprzyk, A ;
Davis, S ;
De Moor, B ;
Brazma, A ;
Huber, W .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 (16) :3439-3440
[9]   Mystery of intron gain [J].
Fedorov, A ;
Roy, S ;
Fedorova, L ;
Gilbert, W .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2003, 13 (10) :2236-2241
[10]   Extent of gene duplication in the genomes of Drosophila, nematode, and yeast [J].
Gu, ZL ;
Cavalcanti, A ;
Chen, FC ;
Bouman, P ;
Li, WH .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2002, 19 (03) :256-262