Costs and cost-effectiveness of a low-intensity patient-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening

被引:25
作者
Shankaran, Veena
Mckoy, June M.
Dandade, Neal
Nonzee, Narissa
Tigue, Cara A.
Bennett, Charles L.
Denberg, Tom D.
机构
[1] NW Univ Feinberg, Sch Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Chicago Healthcare Syst, Chicago, IL USA
[3] NW Univ Feinberg, Sch Med, Div Geriatr Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gen Internal Med, Dept Internal Med, Denver, CO 80309 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.13.4098
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is the most underused evidence-based cancer screening test in the United States. Few studies have reported the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening promotional efforts. In a recent randomized controlled trial, a patient-directed intervention for average-risk patients who had been referred for screening colonoscopy led to a 12% increase in CRC screening rates. The objective of this secondary analysis is to assess the cost-effectiveness of this intervention. Patients and Methods Patients in the intervention arm received a customized mailed brochure that included a reminder to schedule a screening colonoscopy and general information about CRC, the importance of CRC screening, and how to prepare for the procedure. The end point was completion of screening colonoscopy. The costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of this patient-directed intervention were derived. Sensitivity analyses were based on varying the costs of labor and supplies. Results Rates of CRC screening for the intervention (n = 386 patients) versus control (n = 395) arms were 71% and 59%, respectively (P = .001). The total cost of the intervention was $1,927 and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $43 per additional patient screened ($38 to $47 in a sensitivity analysis). Conclusion An intervention based on mailing a customized brochure to patients who were referred for a screening colonoscopy improved CRC screening rates at a university-based general medicine clinic. This intervention was comparable in effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to a similar recently reported low-intensity patient-directed CRC screening intervention, and markedly more affordable and cost-effective than a previously reported physician-directed CRC screening promotion intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:5248 / 5253
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Examining the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening promotion [J].
Andersen, MR ;
Urban, N ;
Ramsey, S ;
Briss, PA .
CANCER, 2004, 101 (05) :1229-1238
[2]  
[Anonymous], CANC FACTS FIG 2007
[3]  
[Anonymous], NCCN PRACT GUID ONC
[4]   Cost-effectiveness of an intervention to increase cancer screening in primary care settings [J].
Chirikos, TN ;
Christman, LK ;
Hunter, S ;
Roetzheim, RG .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 39 (02) :230-238
[5]   Promoting mammography - Results of a randomized trial of telephone counseling and a medical practice intervention [J].
Costanza, ME ;
Stoddard, AM ;
Luckmann, R ;
White, MJ ;
Avrunin, JS ;
Clemow, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 19 (01) :39-46
[6]   Effect of a mailed brochure on appointment-keeping for screening colonoscopy - A randomized trial [J].
Denberg, Thomas D. ;
Coombes, John M. ;
Byers, Tim E. ;
Marcus, Alfred C. ;
Feinberg, Lawrence E. ;
Steiner, John F. ;
Ahnen, Dennis J. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 145 (12) :895-900
[7]   Improving colorectal cancer screening among the medically underserved: A pilot study within a federally qualified health center [J].
Khankari, Kishore ;
Eder, Mickey ;
Osborn, Chandra Y. ;
Makoul, Gregory ;
Clayman, Marla ;
Skripkauskas, Silvia ;
Diamond-Shapiro, Linda ;
Makundan, Dan ;
Wolf, Michael S. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 22 (10) :1410-1414
[8]  
LAIRSON DR, IN PRESS CANC
[9]  
Lantz P M, 1996, J Public Health Manag Pract, V2, P54
[10]  
Lewis C, 2007, J GEN INTERN MED, V22, P104