Learning by doing vs. learning from others in a principal-agent model

被引:13
作者
Arifovic, Jasmina [1 ]
Karaivanov, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Econ, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
关键词
Learning; Principal-agent model; Moral hazard; GENETIC ALGORITHM; MULTIPERIOD; INFORMATION; BEHAVIOR; MARKET; FACTS; GAMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jedc.2010.04.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We introduce learning in a principal-agent model of output sharing under moral hazard. We use social evolutionary learning to represent social learning and reinforcement, experience-weighted attraction (EWA) and individual evolutionary learning (IEL) to represent individual learning. Learning in the principal-agent model is difficult due to: the stochastic environment; the discontinuity in payoffs at the optimal contract; and the incorrect evaluation of foregone payoffs for IEL and EWA. Social learning is much more successful in adapting to the optimal contract than standard individual learning algorithms. A modified IEL using realized payoffs evaluation performs better but still falls short of social learning. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1967 / 1992
页数:26
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Contract theory
[2]  
[Anonymous], SERIES EC LEARNING S
[3]   GENETIC ALGORITHM LEARNING AND THE COBWEB MODEL [J].
ARIFOVIC, J .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 1994, 18 (01) :3-28
[4]   Revisiting individual evolutionary learning in the cobweb model - An illustration of the virtual spite-effect [J].
Arifovic J. ;
Maschek M.K. .
Computational Economics, 2006, 28 (4) :333-354
[6]   Evolutionary algorithms in macroeconomic models [J].
Arifovic, J .
MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2000, 4 (03) :373-414
[7]  
Arifovic J., 2010, IND ORG TRADE SOCIAL
[8]  
Arifovic J., 2004, J PUBLIC ECON THEORY, V6, P205
[9]   Call market book information and efficiency [J].
Arifovic, Jasmina ;
Ledyard, John .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2007, 31 (06) :1971-2000
[10]   THE ECONOMIC-IMPLICATIONS OF LEARNING BY DOING [J].
ARROW, KJ .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1962, 29 (80) :155-173