Do children with Williams syndrome really have good vocabulary knowledge? Methods for comparing cognitive and linguistic abilities in developmental disorders

被引:38
作者
Brock, Jon [1 ]
Jarrold, Christopher
Farran, Emily K.
Laws, Glynis
Riby, Deborah M.
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, MACCS, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England
[3] Univ Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
关键词
Williams syndrome; receptive vocabulary; cognitive skills; methodology;
D O I
10.1080/02699200701541433
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The comparison of cognitive and linguistic skills in individuals with developmental disorders is fraught with methodological and psychometric difficulties. In this paper, we illustrate some of these issues by comparing the receptive vocabulary knowledge and non-verbal reasoning abilities of 41 children with Williams syndrome, a genetic disorder in which language abilities are often claimed to be relatively strong. Data from this group were compared with data from typically developing children, children with Down syndrome, and children with non-specific learning difficulties using a number of approaches including comparison of age-equivalent scores, matching, analysis of covariance, and regression-based standardization. Across these analyses children with Williams syndrome consistently demonstrated relatively good receptive vocabulary knowledge, although this effect appeared strongest in the oldest children.
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 688
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[31]   Exploring the Williams syndrome face-processing debate: the importance of building developmental trajectories [J].
Karmiloff-Smith, A ;
Thomas, M ;
Annaz, D ;
Humphreys, K ;
Ewing, S ;
Brace, N ;
Van Duuren, M ;
Pike, G ;
Grice, S ;
Campbell, R .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 45 (07) :1258-1274
[32]   Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders [J].
Karmiloff-Smith, A .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1998, 2 (10) :389-398
[33]   Dethroning the myth: Cognitive dissociations and innate modularity in Williams syndrome [J].
Karmiloff-Smith, A ;
Brown, JH ;
Grice, S ;
Paterson, S .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 23 (1-2) :227-242
[34]   What can developmental disorders tell us about the neurocomputational constraints that shape development? The case of Williams syndrome [J].
Karmiloff-Smith, A ;
Thomas, M .
DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2003, 15 (04) :969-990
[35]   Language and Williams syndrome: How intact is ''intact''? [J].
KarmiloffSmith, A ;
Grant, J ;
Berthoud, I ;
Davies, M ;
Howlin, P ;
Udwin, O .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1997, 68 (02) :246-262
[36]   Contrasting patterns of cognitive abilities of 9-and 10-year-olds with Williams syndrome or Down syndrome [J].
Klein, BP ;
Mervis, CB .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 16 (02) :177-196
[37]  
Laing E, 2002, DEVELOPMENTAL SCI, V5, P233
[38]   A comparison of language abilities in adolescents with Down syndrome and children with specific language impairment [J].
Laws, G ;
Bishop, DVM .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2003, 46 (06) :1324-1339
[39]   A PARADOX IN INTERPRETATION OF GROUP COMPARISONS [J].
LORD, FM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1967, 68 (05) :304-&
[40]   Methodological issues in group-matching designs:: α levels for control variable comparisons and measurement characteristics of control and target variables [J].
Mervis, CB ;
Klein-Tasman, BP .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2004, 34 (01) :7-17