Obesity Increases Precision Errors in Total Body Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Measurements

被引:41
作者
Knapp, Karen M. [1 ]
Welsman, Joanne R. [1 ]
Hopkins, Susan J. [1 ]
Shallcross, Andrew [1 ]
Fogelman, Ignac [2 ]
Blake, Glen M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Med Imaging, Exeter EX4 4QL, Devon, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Guys Kings & St Thomas Sch Med, Imaging Sci, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
Bone mineral density; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; obesity; precision; LEAST SIGNIFICANT CHANGE; ISCD OFFICIAL POSITIONS; DXA; REPRODUCIBILITY; DENSITOMETRY; ADULTS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocd.2014.06.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Total body (TB) dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is increasingly being used to measure body composition in research and clinical settings. This study investigated the effect of body mass index (BMI) and body fat on precision errors for total and regional TB DXA measurements of bone mineral density, fat tissue, and lean tissue using the GE Lunar Prodigy (GE Healthcare, Bedford, UK). One hundred forty-four women with BMI's ranging from 18.5 to 45.9 kg/m(2) were recruited. Participants had duplicate DXA scans of the TB with repositioning between examinations. Participants were divided into 3 groups based on their BMI, and the root mean square standard deviation and the percentage coefficient of variation were calculated for each group. The root mean square standard deviation (percentage coefficient of variation) for the normal (<25 kg/m(2); n = 76), overweight (25-30 kg/m(2); n = 36), and obese (>30 kg/m(2); n = 32) BMI groups, respectively, were total BMD (g/cm(2)): 0.009 (0.77%), 0.009 (0.69%), 0.011 (0.91%); total fat (g): 545 (2.98%), 486 (1.72%), 677 (1.55%); total lean (g): 551 (1.42%), 540 (1.34%), and 781 (1.68%). These results suggest that serial measurements in obese subjects should be treated with caution because the least significant change may be larger than anticipated.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 216
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
Clinical applications of body composition measurements using DXA [J].
Albanese, CV ;
Diessel, E ;
Genant, HK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2003, 6 (02) :75-85
[2]
Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2007 ISCD Position Development Conference [J].
Baim, Sanford ;
Binkley, Neil ;
Bilezikian, John R. ;
Kendler, David L. ;
Hans, Didier B. ;
Lewiecki, E. Michael ;
Silverman, Stuart .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2008, 11 (01) :75-91
[3]
Dose Absorption in Lumbar and Femoral Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Examinations Using Three Different Scan Modalities: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study [J].
Bandirali, Michele ;
Lanza, Ezio ;
Messina, Carmelo ;
Sconfienza, Luca Maria ;
Brambilla, Roberto ;
Maurizio, Rozza ;
Marchell, Daniele ;
Piodi, Luca Petrucci ;
Di Leo, Giovanni ;
Ulivieri, Fabio Massimo ;
Sardanelli, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2013, 16 (03) :279-282
[4]
Measurement of visceral adipose tissue by DXA combined with anthropometry in obese humans [J].
Bertin, E ;
Marcus, C ;
Ruiz, JC ;
Eschard, JP ;
Leutenegger, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2000, 24 (03) :263-270
[5]
An overlying femur bone fat panniculus affects mass measurement [J].
Binkley, N ;
Krueger, D ;
Vallarta-Ast, N .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2003, 6 (03) :199-204
[6]
Comparison of effective dose to children and adults from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations [J].
Blake, GM ;
Naeem, M ;
Boutros, M .
BONE, 2006, 38 (06) :935-942
[7]
Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Measured Regional Body Composition Least Significant Change: Effect of Region of Interest and Gender in Athletes [J].
Buehring, Bjoern ;
Krueger, Diane ;
Libber, Jessie ;
Heiderscheit, Bryan ;
Sanfilippo, Jennifer ;
Johnson, Brian ;
Haller, Irina ;
Binkley, Neil .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2014, 17 (01) :121-128
[8]
Reproducibility of DXA in obese women [J].
Cordero-MacIntyre, ZR ;
Peters, W ;
Libanati, CR ;
España, RC ;
Abila, SO ;
Howell, WH ;
Lohman, TG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2002, 5 (01) :35-44
[9]
Quality and performance measures in bone densitometry: part 1: errors and diagnosis. [J].
Engelke K. ;
Glüer C.C. .
Osteoporosis International, 2006, 17 (9) :1283-1292
[10]
ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF PRECISION ERRORS - HOW TO MEASURE THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF BONE DENSITOMETRY TECHNIQUES [J].
GLUER, CC ;
BLAKE, G ;
LU, Y ;
BLUNT, BA ;
JERGAS, M ;
GENANT, HK .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 5 (04) :262-270