Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives

被引:69
作者
Goldsmith, Lesley [1 ]
Jackson, Leigh [1 ]
O'Connor, Anita [1 ]
Skirton, Heather [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Plymouth, Somerset Ctr, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Fac Hlth Educ & Soc, Taunton TA1 5YD, Somerset, England
关键词
direct-to-consumer; genomic testing; genetic testing; health professionals; consumers; INFORMATION; ATTITUDES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1038/ejhg.2012.18
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Genetic tests have traditionally been offered by health professionals. However, genomic tests have been available direct to the consumer for the last decade, increasingly via the Internet. The aim of this systematic review was to ascertain the evidence concerning use of direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the consumer perspective. Primary research was identified using the search terms 'direct-to-consumer' and 'genomic or genetic' in six bibliographic databases and citation searching of findings. In all, 17 papers were reviewed: 3 qualitative and 14 quantitative. Findings indicate a low level of awareness of direct-to-consumer genomic testing and, because of the hypothetical nature of many studies, little evidence from users of such tests. Although potential users appear to be interested in information about their risks of developing common diseases, concerns were expressed about privacy of genetic risk information and the reliability of genomic tests. Consumers were anxious about the nature of the results. There appeared to be a preference to access genomic tests via a health professional, or to discuss the results and obtain advice from a health professional. Authors of only two papers recruited participants who had used direct-to-consumer tests and samples from the large quantitative studies were not representative of the population. These factors limit the value of the available evidence. However, we conclude that there is public interest in direct-to-consumer genomic tests, and that this is likely to result in an increased workload for a range of health professionals. We also consider that there are educational implications for both consumers and health professionals. European Journal of Human Genetics (2012) 20, 811-816; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2012.18; published online 15 February 2012
引用
收藏
页码:811 / 816
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]   Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users [J].
McGowan, Michelle L. ;
Fishman, Jennifer R. ;
Lambrix, Marcie A. .
NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2010, 29 (03) :261-290
[22]   Social Networkers' Attitudes Toward Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing [J].
McGuire, Amy L. ;
Diaz, Christina M. ;
Wang, Tao ;
Hilsenbeck, Susan G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2009, 9 (6-7) :3-10
[23]   An Unwelcome Side Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing Raiding the Medical Commons [J].
McGuire, Amy L. ;
Burke, Wylie .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 300 (22) :2669-2671
[24]   Informed choice in direct-to-consumer genetic testing for Alzheimer and other diseases: lessons from two cases [J].
Messner, Donna A. .
NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2011, 30 (01) :59-72
[25]   Illusions of scientific legitimacy: misrepresented science in the direct-to-consumer genetic-testing marketplace [J].
Murray, Amy B. Vashlishan ;
Carson, Michael J. ;
Morris, Corey A. ;
Beckwith, Jon .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2010, 26 (11) :459-461
[26]  
National Human Genome Research Institute, 2011, CATALOG PUBLISHED GE
[27]   An agenda for personalized medicine [J].
Ng, Pauline C. ;
Venter, J. Craig ;
Murray, Sarah S. ;
Levy, Samuel .
NATURE, 2009, 461 (7265) :724-726
[28]  
O'Neill SC, 2008, GENET MED, V10, P121, DOI 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f8e06
[29]  
Ortiz AP, 2011, PREV CHRONIC DIS, V8
[30]   Attitudes Toward Direct-to-Consumer Advertisements and Online Genetic Testing Among High-Risk Women Participating in a Hereditary Cancer Clinic [J].
Perez, Giselle K. ;
Cruess, Dean G. ;
Cruess, Stacy ;
Brewer, Molly ;
Stroop, Jennifer ;
Schwartz, Robin ;
Greenstein, Robert .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2011, 16 (06) :607-628