Approved IFCC recommendation on reporting results for blood glucose (abbreviated)

被引:164
作者
D'Orazio, P
Burnett, RW
Fogh-Andersen, N [1 ]
Jacobs, E
Kuwa, K
Külpmann, WR
Larsson, L
Lewenstam, A
Maas, AHJ
Mager, G
Naskalski, JW
Okorodudu, AO
机构
[1] Herlev Hosp, Dept Clin Biochem, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[2] Instrumetat Lab, Lexington, MA USA
[3] Hartford Hosp, Hartford, CT 06115 USA
[4] Wadsworth Ctr, Albany, NY USA
[5] Univ Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
[6] Hannover Med Sch, Hannover, Germany
[7] Linkoping Univ, Linkoping, Sweden
[8] Abo Akad Univ, Turku, Finland
[9] Isala Klin, Dept Cardiol, Zwolle, Netherlands
[10] Fresenius, Bad Homburg, Germany
[11] Jagiellonian Univ, Krakow, Poland
[12] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Dept Pathol, Galveston, TX 77550 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1373/clinchem.2005.051979
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
In current clinical practice, plasma and blood glucose are used interchangeably with a consequent risk of clinical misinterpretation. In human blood, glucose, like water, is distributed between erythrocytes and plasma. The molality of glucose (amount of glucose per unit of water mass) is the same throughout the sample, but the concentration is higher in plasma because the concentration of water and, therefore, glucose is higher in plasma than in erythrocytes. Different devices for the measurement of glucose may detect and report fundamentally different quantities. Different water concentrations in calibrators, plasma, and erythrocyte fluid can explain some of the differences. Results of glucose measurements depend on sample type and on whether methods require sample dilution or use biosensors in undiluted samples. If the results are mixed up or used indiscriminately, the differences may exceed the maximum allowable error of glucose determinations for diagnosing and monitoring diabetes mellitus, and complicate the treatment. The goal of the IFCC Scientific Division Working Group on Selective Electrodes and Point of Care Testing (IFCC-SD, WG-SEPOCT) is to reach a global consensus on reporting results. The document recommends reporting the concentration of glucose in plasma (with the unit mmol/L), irrespective of sample type or measurement technique. A constant factor of 1.11 is used to convert concentration in whole blood to the equivalent concentration in the pertinent plasma. The conversion will provide harmonized results, facilitating the classification and care of patients and leading to fewer therapeutic misjudgments. (C) 2005 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.
引用
收藏
页码:1573 / 1576
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, DIABETES CARE, V28, pS4
[2]   WHAT IS BLOOD-GLUCOSE - CAN IT BE MEASURED [J].
BURRIN, JM ;
ALBERTI, KGMM .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 1990, 7 (03) :199-206
[3]  
Chance JJ, 1999, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V111, P547
[4]  
Fogh-Andersen N, 1998, CLIN CHEM, V44, P655
[5]  
Fogh-Andersen N, 2004, POINT CARE, V3, P172
[6]   DIRECT READING GLUCOSE ELECTRODES DETECT THE MOLALITY OF GLUCOSE IN PLASMA AND WHOLE-BLOOD [J].
FOGHANDERSEN, N ;
WIMBERLEY, PD ;
THODE, J ;
SIGGAARDANDERSEN, O .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1990, 189 (01) :33-38
[7]   Accuracy of devices used for self-monitoring of blood glucose [J].
Johnson, RN ;
Baker, JR .
ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1998, 35 :68-74
[8]   Multicenter study of oxygen-insensitive handheld glucose point-of-care testing in critical care hospital ambulatory patients in the United States and Canada [J].
Kost, GJ ;
Vu, HT ;
Lee, JH ;
Bourgeois, P ;
Kiechle, FL ;
Martin, C ;
Miller, SS ;
Okorodudu, AO ;
Podczasy, JJ ;
Webster, R ;
Whitlow, KJ .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (03) :581-590
[9]  
MOLITCH ME, 1994, DIABETES CARE, V17, P81
[10]   5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP-STUDY ON PLASMA-INSULIN LEVELS IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED NIDDM PATIENTS AND NONDIABETIC SUBJECTS [J].
NISKANEN, LK ;
UUSITUPA, MI ;
SARLUND, H ;
SIITONEN, O ;
PYORALA, K .
DIABETES CARE, 1990, 13 (01) :41-48